PeaZip vs File Roller Comparison
Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.
PeaZip
PeaZip is a free and open-source file archiver and file manager utility. It offers robust archiving capabilities supporting a wide range of formats, strong encryption options, and a built-in file explorer, making it a comprehensive tool for file compression, archiving, and security. by Giorgio Tani
File Roller
File Roller is the official archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. It supports a wide range of popular archive formats. by Paolo Bacchilega
Summary
PeaZip and File Roller are both powerful solutions in their space. PeaZip offers peazip is a free and open-source file archiver and file manager utility. it offers robust archiving capabilities supporting a wide range of formats, strong encryption options, and a built-in file explorer, making it a comprehensive tool for file compression, archiving, and security., while File Roller provides file roller is the official archive manager for the gnome desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. it supports a wide range of popular archive formats.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.
Pros & Cons Comparison
PeaZip
Pros
- Supports a very wide range of archive formats for both creation and extraction.
- Offers strong AES 256-bit encryption for data security.
- Free and open-source with no advertisements or bundled software.
- Includes useful extra tools like a file manager, hash check, and secure deletion.
- Available as a portable application.
Cons
- User interface, while functional, may feel less modern compared to some commercial alternatives.
File Roller
Pros
- Excellent integration with GNOME desktop.
- Simple and intuitive user interface.
- Supports a wide range of common archive formats.
- Easy to use for basic compression and extraction.
- Lightweight and resource-efficient.
Cons
- Lacks advanced features found in specialized archiving software.
- Limited options for fine-tuning compression settings.
- May not support all niche archive formats.
Compare With Others
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.