PeaZip vs Xarchiver

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

PeaZip icon

PeaZip

PeaZip is a free and open-source file archiver and file manager utility. It offers robust archiving capabilities supporting a wide range of formats, strong encryption options, and a built-in file explorer, making it a comprehensive tool for file compression, archiving, and security. by Giorgio Tani

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Xarchiver icon

Xarchiver

Xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for Linux and BSD systems. It acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types. by Giuseppe Torelli - Colossus

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

PeaZip and Xarchiver are both powerful solutions in their space. PeaZip offers peazip is a free and open-source file archiver and file manager utility. it offers robust archiving capabilities supporting a wide range of formats, strong encryption options, and a built-in file explorer, making it a comprehensive tool for file compression, archiving, and security., while Xarchiver provides xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for linux and bsd systems. it acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

PeaZip

PeaZip

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a very wide range of archive formats for both creation and extraction.
Offers strong AES 256-bit encryption for data security.
Free and open-source with no advertisements or bundled software.
Includes useful extra tools like a file manager, hash check, and secure deletion.
Available as a portable application.

Limitations

User interface, while functional, may feel less modern compared to some commercial alternatives.
Xarchiver

Xarchiver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent compatibility across various desktop environments due to its GTK foundation.
Very lightweight and resource-efficient, ideal for older or resource-constrained systems.
Supports a wide range of archive formats by leveraging established command-line utilities.
Simple and intuitive user interface for core archiving tasks.
Reliable performance for creating and extracting archives.

Limitations

User interface is basic and lacks modern graphical elements.
Relies on external command-line utilities for format support, which need to be installed separately.
Lacks advanced features like integrated file previews, extensive repair tools, or highly granular compression controls.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare