Qiqqa VS Citavi
Citavi is a more comprehensive tool for reference management and task management, making it suitable for academic projects requiring collaboration, while Qiqqa excels in PDF management and visual organization, catering well to researchers who prioritize document handling.
Qiqqa
Pros:
- Strong PDF management
- Automatic citation generation
- User-friendly interface
- Rich tagging and organization features
- Excellent for visual thinkers
Cons:
- Limited integration with some databases
- Less robust task management features
- Occasional performance issues with large libraries
Citavi
Pros:
- Comprehensive reference management
- Intuitive interface
- Powerful citation tools
- Task management features
- Collaboration capabilities
Cons:
- Can be complex for new users
- Licensing cost can be high
- Limited support for non-Latin scripts
Compare Qiqqa
