QTTabBar vs Explorer++ : Which is Better?

QTTabBar icon

QTTabBar

QTTabBar extends Explorer by tabs and extra folder views. Developed by Quizo

License: Free

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Windows Windows Explorer

VS
VS
Explorer++ icon

Explorer++

Explorer++ is a free and open-source navigational file manager for Microsoft Windows. It features multi-tabbed panes, bookmarks menu, and a customizable user interface. It can be configured to run portably or use the registry. It can also be set to replace Windows Explorer as the default file manager. Developed by David Erceg

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Windows Discontinued

QTTabBar VS Explorer++

Explorer++ is a lightweight and portable file manager that offers basic tab management and customizable interface options, making it suitable for general users seeking simplicity. In contrast, QTTabBar provides advanced features such as file previews, built-in compression, and extensive plugin support, catering to power users who need robust file management capabilities.

QTTabBar

Pros:

  • Rich tab management features
  • File preview functionality
  • Built-in file compression
  • Wide range of plugins available
  • Integrated FTP client
  • Folder synchronization capability
  • File tagging support
  • Customizable interface with various options
  • Supports multiple languages
  • Great for power users needing advanced features

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for new users
  • May have a steeper learning curve
  • Performance may vary with many plugins
  • Requires integration with Windows Explorer for full functionality
  • Not portable
  • More resource-intensive than Explorer++
  • Dependency on Windows Explorer
  • Complex setup for some features

Explorer++

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Portable version available
  • User-friendly interface
  • Supports multiple tabs
  • Customizable with skins
  • Quick file operations
  • Bookmarking functionality
  • Multi-panel support
  • Keyboard shortcuts for efficiency
  • Detailed file information view

Cons:

  • Limited advanced features
  • No built-in file preview
  • Not as customizable as QTTabBar
  • Lacks file synchronization
  • No integrated FTP client
  • No plugins support
  • Fewer options for file tagging
  • No built-in file compression

Compare QTTabBar

vs
Compare One Commander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Clover and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Dolphin File Manager and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Far Manager and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Finder and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Ghost Commander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNOME Commander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Krusader and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Midnight Commander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare muCommander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Multi Commander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare My Commander and QTTabBar and decide which is most suitable for you.