reaver vs KisMAC : Which is Better?
reaver
Reaver implements a brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup (WPS) registrar PINs in order to recover WPA/WPA2 passphrases. Developed by Tactical Network Solutions
License: Open Source
VS
VS
reaver VS KisMAC
Reaver is a command-line tool focused on exploiting WPS vulnerabilities in routers, making it suitable for advanced users, while KisMAC is a user-friendly tool designed for network scanning and analysis on Mac OS X. Reaver is more specialized for PIN recovery, whereas KisMAC offers a broader range of network analysis features.
reaver
Pros:
- Open-source and free to use
- Supports a wide range of wireless chipsets
- Effective for WPS PIN recovery
- Can run on various platforms including Linux
- Command-line interface for advanced users
Cons:
- Requires some technical knowledge
- Can be slow on certain networks
- Limited support for newer WPS implementations
KisMAC
Pros:
- User-friendly graphical interface
- Supports passive and active scanning
- Can capture and analyze network packets
- Provides detailed network information
- Compatible with Mac OS X
Cons:
- Limited to Mac OS X platform
- Less effective on networks with strong security
- May not support all wireless chipsets
Compare reaver
