rxvt-unicode vs Hyper : Which is Better?
rxvt-unicode
rxvt-unicode is a customizable terminal emulator forked from rxvt.
License: Open Source
VS
VS
rxvt-unicode VS Hyper
Hyper is a modern, highly customizable terminal built on web technologies, making it suitable for users who prioritize aesthetics and functionality. In contrast, rxvt-unicode is a lightweight, minimalistic terminal focused on performance and basic terminal tasks, making it ideal for users seeking speed and efficiency.
rxvt-unicode
Pros:
- Lightweight and fast
- Unicode support for internationalization
- Highly configurable via text files
- Minimalistic design
- Good performance for basic terminal tasks
Cons:
- Limited graphical features compared to Hyper
- Less modern UI compared to other terminals
- Fewer built-in features than some alternatives
Hyper
Pros:
- Cross-platform support (macOS, Windows, Linux)
- Highly customizable with plugins and themes
- Integrated terminal with split panes
- Supports modern web technologies (HTML, CSS, JS)
- Fast performance with GPU acceleration
Cons:
- Can be resource-intensive compared to traditional terminals
- May require additional setup for plugins
- Occasional compatibility issues with some terminal applications
Compare rxvt-unicode
Compare ConEmu and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Console and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare ConsoleZ and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare FireCMD and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Terminal and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare JuiceSSH and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Konsole and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare LXTerminal and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare mintty and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.