rxvt-unicode vs Sakura : Which is Better?
rxvt-unicode
rxvt-unicode is a customizable terminal emulator forked from rxvt.
License: Open Source
VS
VS
License: Open Source
rxvt-unicode VS Sakura
rxvt-unicode is a lightweight and highly customizable terminal emulator favored by advanced users, while Sakura offers a more user-friendly interface with decent customization options but can be resource-heavy.
rxvt-unicode
Pros:
- Lightweight and fast
- Highly customizable
- Supports multiple tabs
- Unicode support
- Xterm-compatible
- Minimalist design
- Good performance with low resources
- Active community support
Cons:
- Steeper learning curve for customization
- Limited graphical features
- Not as user-friendly for beginners
Sakura
Pros:
- User-friendly interface
- Supports multiple tabs
- Configurable keyboard shortcuts
- Extensive customization options
- Good support for various character encodings
Cons:
- Can be resource-heavy compared to alternatives
- Less customizable than rxvt-unicode
- Limited community compared to larger terminal emulators
Compare rxvt-unicode
Compare ConEmu and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Console and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare ConsoleZ and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare FireCMD and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Terminal and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare JuiceSSH and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Konsole and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare LXTerminal and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.