rxvt-unicode vs Xfce-Terminal : Which is Better?

rxvt-unicode icon

rxvt-unicode

rxvt-unicode is a customizable terminal emulator forked from rxvt.

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Mac OS X Linux

VS
VS
Xfce-Terminal icon

Xfce-Terminal

Xfce Terminal was developed to fit the need for a lightweight and easy to use terminal emulator in the Xfce desktop environment. Developed by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Nick Schermer

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux BSD Xfce

rxvt-unicode VS Xfce-Terminal

rxvt-unicode is a lightweight and highly customizable terminal emulator that excels in resource management and user configuration but lacks user-friendly features like tabs and session management. In contrast, Xfce-Terminal offers a more integrated and feature-rich experience with built-in tabs and session support, making it suitable for users who prefer a straightforward and visually appealing interface.

rxvt-unicode

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Highly customizable
  • Low resource usage
  • Good Unicode support
  • Supports transparency
  • Mouse support
  • Extensive keyboard shortcuts
  • Good font support
  • Flexible configuration options
  • Supports various character encodings

Cons:

  • Lacks built-in tabs
  • Steeper learning curve for configuration
  • Less user-friendly interface
  • Limited session management
  • Less integration with desktop environments
  • Lacks split view support
  • Minimal default settings
  • Not as visually appealing
  • No built-in search functionality
  • Limited mouse support

Xfce-Terminal

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Built-in tabs support
  • Session management features
  • Good integration with Xfce desktop
  • Split view functionality
  • Search functionality
  • Support for color schemes
  • Lower learning curve
  • Active development and community support
  • Easy to use for beginners

Cons:

  • Higher resource usage compared to rxvt-unicode
  • Less customizable than rxvt-unicode
  • May be slower on older systems
  • Limited transparency options
  • Less flexibility in configuration
  • Fewer keyboard shortcuts compared to rxvt-unicode
  • Dependence on Xfce environment
  • Limited encoding support
  • Default settings may not be sufficient for advanced users
  • May struggle with heavy workloads

Compare rxvt-unicode

vs
Compare cmder and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ConEmu and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Console and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ConsoleZ and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FireCMD and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNOME Terminal and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Hyper and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iTerm and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare JuiceSSH and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare KiTTY and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Konsole and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare LXTerminal and rxvt-unicode and decide which is most suitable for you.