SimpleScreenRecorder vs recordMyDesktop : Which is Better?

SimpleScreenRecorder icon

SimpleScreenRecorder

SimpleScreenRecorder is a Qt-based screencast software made for Linux operating systems, which was created as a simpler alternative to programs such as ffmpeg/avconv and VLC.

License: Open Source

Categories: Video & Movies

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
recordMyDesktop icon

recordMyDesktop

recordMyDesktop is a free and open source desktop screencasting software application written for Linux. Developed by Martin Nordholts

License: Open Source

Categories: Video & Movies

Apps available for Linux BSD Discontinued

SimpleScreenRecorder VS recordMyDesktop

SimpleScreenRecorder offers advanced features like customizable frame rates, built-in editing tools, and hardware encoding, making it suitable for more demanding recording tasks. In contrast, recordMyDesktop is a lightweight, open-source option that excels in simplicity and low resource usage, making it ideal for basic screen recording needs.

SimpleScreenRecorder

Pros:

  • Supports a variety of video formats
  • Customizable frame rates and resolutions
  • Easy-to-use interface for beginners
  • Built-in video editing tools for post-capture modifications
  • Good community support for troubleshooting
  • Real-time screen capturing with minimal lag
  • Efficient file size optimization
  • Hardware encoding support for better performance
  • Multi-language support for wider accessibility
  • Supports multiple monitors for advanced setups

Cons:

  • Not open-source software
  • Limited audio input options compared to competitors
  • More demanding on system resources than some alternatives
  • Less suitable for command line users
  • Limited functionality for very advanced users
  • No extensive community-driven plugins
  • Not as universally compatible with older systems

recordMyDesktop

Pros:

  • Open-source and free to use
  • Lightweight with low system resource usage
  • Command line interface for advanced users
  • Good audio recording capabilities
  • Real-time screen capture with minimal lag
  • Easy to set up and start recording
  • Community-driven support and updates
  • Cross-platform support
  • Suitable for simple and straightforward recording tasks
  • Low footprint on system resources

Cons:

  • Lacks advanced editing features
  • User interface may feel outdated
  • Limited support for video formats compared to competitors
  • No support for hardware encoding
  • Less suitable for high-performance recording needs
  • No built-in tutorials for beginners
  • Fewer customization options for user interface
  • Limited optimization features for file sizes
  • Not ideal for multi-monitor setups
  • Less community support compared to other software

Compare SimpleScreenRecorder

vs
Compare Action! and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ActivePresenter and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bandicam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FlashBack and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CamStudio and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Camtasia Studio and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Captura and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Debut Video Capture Software and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iSpring Free Cam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Kazam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Krut and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare oCam and SimpleScreenRecorder and decide which is most suitable for you.