SugarSync vs AeroFS

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

SugarSync icon

SugarSync

SugarSync is a powerful cloud synchronization and backup service that allows users to sync any folder on their computer across multiple devices. It offers real-time syncing, file sharing, and robust security features to keep your data accessible and protected. by SugarSync

Commercial
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Windows Mobile Android iPhone Symbian S60 Blackberry Windows RT Android Tablet iPad Microsoft Office Outlook Kindle Fire
Screenshots:
VS
AeroFS icon

AeroFS

AeroFS is a robust enterprise-grade file synchronization and collaboration platform designed for organizations prioritizing data control and security. by Air Computing Inc.

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux iPhone iPad
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

SugarSync and AeroFS are both powerful solutions in their space. SugarSync offers sugarsync is a powerful cloud synchronization and backup service that allows users to sync any folder on their computer across multiple devices. it offers real-time syncing, file sharing, and robust security features to keep your data accessible and protected., while AeroFS provides aerofs is a robust enterprise-grade file synchronization and collaboration platform designed for organizations prioritizing data control and security.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

SugarSync

SugarSync

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Sync any folder on your computer.
Real-time synchronization across devices.
Robust version history for file recovery.
Effective selective sync feature.

Limitations

Pricing can be a factor for large storage needs.
User interface is functional but not the most modern.
AeroFS

AeroFS

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Offers self-hosted deployment for maximum data control and security.
Provides robust end-to-end encryption for sensitive files.
Includes strong file versioning and backup capabilities.
Supports unlimited storage based on available infrastructure.
Utilizes peer-to-peer technology for potentially faster syncs.
Features selective sync to manage local storage.

Limitations

Requires internal IT resources for self-hosted deployment and management.
Specifics on external sharing controls are not fully detailed in the provided context.
Peer-to-peer performance can be dependent on network configuration.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare