SugarSync vs Ozibox Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

SugarSync

SugarSync is a powerful cloud synchronization and backup service that allows users to sync any folder on their computer across multiple devices. It offers real-time syncing, file sharing, and robust security features to keep your data accessible and protected. by SugarSync

Commercial

Categories:

Available for:

Mac OS X Windows Windows Mobile Android iPhone Symbian S60 Blackberry Windows RT Android Tablet iPad Microsoft Office Outlook Kindle Fire

Alternatives Details Website

Ozibox

Ozibox is a cloud storage and file synchronization service offering a free plan for online backup. It provides fundamental features for storing and syncing files across multiple devices, with a focus on accessibility and community-driven approaches.

Free

Categories:

Available for:

Online

Alternatives Details Website

Summary

SugarSync and Ozibox are both powerful solutions in their space. SugarSync offers sugarsync is a powerful cloud synchronization and backup service that allows users to sync any folder on their computer across multiple devices. it offers real-time syncing, file sharing, and robust security features to keep your data accessible and protected., while Ozibox provides ozibox is a cloud storage and file synchronization service offering a free plan for online backup. it provides fundamental features for storing and syncing files across multiple devices, with a focus on accessibility and community-driven approaches.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

SugarSync

Pros

Sync any folder on your computer.
Real-time synchronization across devices.
Robust version history for file recovery.
Effective selective sync feature.

Cons

Pricing can be a factor for large storage needs.
User interface is functional but not the most modern.

Ozibox

Pros

Offers a free plan for online backup.
Provides basic cloud storage and file syncing.
Includes file versioning for data recovery.
Features selective synchronization to save space.
Easy file sharing capabilities are available.

Cons

Limited information available on advanced features and infrastructure.
Details on security and encryption implementation are not fully transparent.
The 'community cloud' model needs further clarification.
Specific storage limits for free and paid tiers are not detailed in provided context.
Performance and reliability metrics are not readily available.