Universal Viewer vs File Roller

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Universal Viewer icon

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications. by UVViewSoft

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
File Roller icon

File Roller

File Roller is the official archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. It supports a wide range of popular archive formats. by Paolo Bacchilega

Open Source
Platforms: Linux GNOME
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Universal Viewer and File Roller are both powerful solutions in their space. Universal Viewer offers universal viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications., while File Roller provides file roller is the official archive manager for the gnome desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. it supports a wide range of popular archive formats.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a very wide range of file formats.
Completely portable, no installation required.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.
Useful binary and hexadecimal viewing modes.
Efficient searching across different file types.

Limitations

Does not offer editing capabilities.
Multimedia playback relies on system codecs.
Interface, while functional, is relatively basic.
File Roller

File Roller

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent integration with GNOME desktop.
Simple and intuitive user interface.
Supports a wide range of common archive formats.
Easy to use for basic compression and extraction.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features found in specialized archiving software.
Limited options for fine-tuning compression settings.
May not support all niche archive formats.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare