Evince vs Universal Viewer

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Evince icon

Evince

Evince is a lightweight and versatile document viewer designed for various formats including PDF, PostScript, DjVu, TIFF, XPS, and DVI. It provides a clean and intuitive interface for easily accessing and navigating your documents. by The GNOME Project

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux PortableApps.com
Screenshots:
VS
Universal Viewer icon

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications. by UVViewSoft

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Evince and Universal Viewer are both powerful solutions in their space. Evince offers evince is a lightweight and versatile document viewer designed for various formats including pdf, postscript, djvu, tiff, xps, and dvi. it provides a clean and intuitive interface for easily accessing and navigating your documents., while Universal Viewer provides universal viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Evince

Evince

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide variety of document formats (PDF, PS, DjVu, TIFF, XPS, DVI).
Extremely lightweight and uses minimal system resources.
Provides fast loading and smooth navigation.
Clean and easy-to-use interface.
Includes basic PDF highlighting capabilities.

Limitations

Lacks advanced PDF editing features.
Annotation features are limited.
No support for filling interactive PDF forms.
Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a very wide range of file formats.
Completely portable, no installation required.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.
Useful binary and hexadecimal viewing modes.
Efficient searching across different file types.

Limitations

Does not offer editing capabilities.
Multimedia playback relies on system codecs.
Interface, while functional, is relatively basic.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare