Universal Viewer vs Pinta : Which is Better?

Universal Viewer icon

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer is an advanced file viewer for wide range of formats. Developed by UVViewSoft

License: Freemium

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
Pinta icon

Pinta

Pinta is an open-source, cross-platform bitmap image drawing and editing program inspired by Paint.NET. Developed by Pinta Maintainers (previously Jonathan Pobst) & contributors

License: Open Source

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Xfce

Universal Viewer VS Pinta

Universal Viewer excels in collaboration and user-friendliness, making it suitable for educational and sharing purposes. In contrast, Pinta offers robust image editing features with layer support, making it better suited for users needing lightweight yet functional editing capabilities.

Universal Viewer

Pros:

  • Strong collaboration tools
  • User-friendly interface
  • Extensive file format support
  • Cross-platform availability
  • Built-in tutorials
  • Good performance with large files
  • Customizable interface
  • Active community support
  • Multiple export options
  • Integration with other tools

Cons:

  • Limited image editing tools
  • No layer support
  • Less suitable for advanced image manipulation
  • Limited plugin options
  • No mobile accessibility
  • Not ideal for heavy editing tasks
  • Less customizable than some alternatives
  • Version control features are lacking
  • Collaboration features may not be robust
  • Not ideal for professional use cases

Pinta

Pros:

  • Layer support for advanced editing
  • Image editing tools for more functionality
  • Plugin support for added features
  • Mobile accessibility for on-the-go use
  • Simple and intuitive interface
  • Good performance for smaller images
  • Open-source and free to use
  • Versatile usage for casual to moderate tasks
  • Support for a variety of image formats
  • Active development and updates

Cons:

  • Lacks collaboration and sharing tools
  • Not as feature-rich as some professional tools
  • Limited community support compared to larger applications
  • Less suitable for very large images
  • No built-in tutorials
  • Can be less intuitive for first-time users
  • Limited export options compared to more advanced software
  • Not ideal for high-end graphic design
  • Requires some learning curve for advanced tools
  • No direct integration with other tools

Compare Universal Viewer

vs
Compare Bandizip and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare DivX and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Document Viewer and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Documents and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare EditPad Lite and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare EmEditor and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Evince and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare glogg and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Kami and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MPC-BE and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Mylio and Universal Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.