Universal Viewer vs Xarchiver

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Universal Viewer icon

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications. by UVViewSoft

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Xarchiver icon

Xarchiver

Xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for Linux and BSD systems. It acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types. by Giuseppe Torelli - Colossus

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Universal Viewer and Xarchiver are both powerful solutions in their space. Universal Viewer offers universal viewer is a portable file viewer capable of displaying a wide array of file formats, including documents, images, media, and raw files, without requiring the associated native applications., while Xarchiver provides xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for linux and bsd systems. it acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Universal Viewer

Universal Viewer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a very wide range of file formats.
Completely portable, no installation required.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.
Useful binary and hexadecimal viewing modes.
Efficient searching across different file types.

Limitations

Does not offer editing capabilities.
Multimedia playback relies on system codecs.
Interface, while functional, is relatively basic.
Xarchiver

Xarchiver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent compatibility across various desktop environments due to its GTK foundation.
Very lightweight and resource-efficient, ideal for older or resource-constrained systems.
Supports a wide range of archive formats by leveraging established command-line utilities.
Simple and intuitive user interface for core archiving tasks.
Reliable performance for creating and extracting archives.

Limitations

User interface is basic and lacks modern graphical elements.
Relies on external command-line utilities for format support, which need to be installed separately.
Lacks advanced features like integrated file previews, extensive repair tools, or highly granular compression controls.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare