VMware Fusion vs KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) : Which is Better?
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion is a software hypervisor developed by VMware for Macintosh computers. VMware Fusion allows Intel-based Macs to run operating systems such as Microsoft Windows, Linux, NetWare, or Solaris on virtual machines, along with their Mac OS X operating system using a combination of paravirtualization, hardware virtualization and dynamic recompilation. Developed by VMware
License: Commercial
VMware Fusion VS KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)
KVM is an open-source virtualization solution that integrates closely with the Linux kernel, offering high performance and flexibility, while VMware Fusion is a commercial product designed for macOS users, providing a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with macOS features.
VMware Fusion
Pros:
- User-friendly interface
- Supports macOS and Windows as hosts
- Seamless integration with macOS features
- Snapshot and cloning capabilities
- Robust support for 3D graphics
Cons:
- Paid software with licensing fees
- Limited customization compared to KVM
- Less flexibility in networking options
KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)
Pros:
- Open-source and free to use
- Integrated with Linux kernel
- Supports a wide range of guest operating systems
- High performance with near-native speed
- Flexible networking options
Cons:
- Requires Linux knowledge for setup and management
- Limited GUI options for management
- Performance may vary based on hardware configuration
Compare VMware Fusion
