WhiteStarUML vs ArgoUML

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

WhiteStarUML icon

WhiteStarUML

WhiteStarUML is a comprehensive, open-source UML modeling tool designed for software developers and system architects. It supports a wide range of UML diagrams and offers features like code generation and reverse engineering. by Janusz Szpilewski

Open Source
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
ArgoUML icon

ArgoUML

ArgoUML is a Java-based, open-source UML modeling tool designed for creating dynamic and static diagrams in a structured manner. It supports a wide range of UML 1.4 diagrams and offers features to aid in the design process. by CollabNet

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

WhiteStarUML and ArgoUML are both powerful solutions in their space. WhiteStarUML offers whitestaruml is a comprehensive, open-source uml modeling tool designed for software developers and system architects. it supports a wide range of uml diagrams and offers features like code generation and reverse engineering., while ArgoUML provides argouml is a java-based, open-source uml modeling tool designed for creating dynamic and static diagrams in a structured manner. it supports a wide range of uml 1.4 diagrams and offers features to aid in the design process.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

WhiteStarUML

WhiteStarUML

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Comprehensive UML diagram support
Free and open source
Code generation and reverse engineering capabilities
Plugin architecture for extensibility
Supports a variety of diagram types

Limitations

User documentation could be more extensive
Collaboration features are not real-time
Integration with specific IDEs may require custom plugins
ArgoUML

ArgoUML

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source with a permissive license.
Supports a comprehensive set of UML 1.4 diagrams.
Cross-platform compatibility due to being Java-based.
Includes internal consistency checking for model validation.
Provides a model explorer for structured navigation.

Limitations

User interface appears somewhat dated.
Performance can be an issue with very large models.
Active development and community support may vary.
Focuses on the older UML 1.4 standard.
May lack some advanced features found in commercial tools.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare