File Explorer vs Thunar

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

File Explorer icon

File Explorer

File Explorer, previously known as Windows Explorer, is the default file manager application for Microsoft Windows, providing a foundational interface for accessing, organizing, and managing files and folders. by Microsoft

Free
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

File Explorer and Thunar are both powerful solutions in their space. File Explorer offers file explorer, previously known as windows explorer, is the default file manager application for microsoft windows, providing a foundational interface for accessing, organizing, and managing files and folders., while Thunar provides thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

File Explorer

File Explorer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Comes pre-installed with Windows.
Easy to use for basic file operations.
Integrated search functionality.
Supports essential file compression.
Offers file previews for quick viewing.

Limitations

Lacks some advanced features found in third-party managers.
Performance can be slow with large directories.
Customization options are limited compared to alternatives.
Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare