wxWidgets vs GTK+ : Which is Better?

wxWidgets icon

wxWidgets

wxWidgets (wix-widgets, formerly wxWindows) is a widget toolkit and tools library for creating graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for cross-platform applications.

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux

VS
VS
GTK+ icon

GTK+

GTK+ (GIMP Toolkit) is a cross-platform widget toolkit for creating graphical user interface. Developed by GNOME Foundation

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux

wxWidgets VS GTK+

wxWidgets and GTK+ are both powerful GUI toolkits, with wxWidgets offering a more native look across platforms and a broader programming language support, while GTK+ provides a modern widget set and is deeply integrated with the GNOME desktop environment. GTK+ may be more resource-intensive and less cross-platform friendly, whereas wxWidgets is preferred for applications needing a lightweight solution with native performance.

wxWidgets

Pros:

  • Cross-platform support including Windows, macOS, Linux
  • Native look and feel on different platforms
  • Rich set of widgets and controls
  • Supports multiple programming languages like C++, Python, etc.
  • Good documentation and community support
  • Flexible licensing options
  • Easy to integrate with other libraries
  • Robust event handling system
  • Good performance for GUI applications
  • Supports internationalization

Cons:

  • Less modern UI components compared to GTK+
  • Limited support for some advanced graphical features
  • May have performance issues on certain platforms
  • Dependency on wxWidgets library for distribution
  • Not as popular as GTK+ for certain applications
  • Limited support for animations and graphics effects
  • Less focus on mobile development
  • Learning curve can be steep for beginners
  • Limited support for web technologies
  • Some components may feel outdated

GTK+

Pros:

  • Extensive widget set for modern UI design
  • Strong community and documentation
  • Good performance due to native integration
  • Strong support for accessibility features
  • Highly customizable with theming support
  • Widely used in GNOME desktop environment
  • Good support for internationalization
  • Active development and updates
  • Supports multiple programming languages
  • Integration with other libraries and tools

Cons:

  • Primarily focused on Linux, less support for Windows/macOS
  • Heavier on system resources compared to wxWidgets
  • Potential compatibility issues with older applications
  • More complex to set up for cross-platform development
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Dependence on specific libraries for certain features
  • Not as flexible as wxWidgets in terms of integration
  • Documentation can be overwhelming due to its size
  • Less support for older versions of Windows
  • Limited support for non-GNOME environments

Compare wxWidgets

vs
Compare Electron / Atom Shell and wxWidgets and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PyQt and wxWidgets and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Qt and wxWidgets and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Qt Creator and wxWidgets and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare wxPython and wxWidgets and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare wxSVG and wxWidgets and decide which is most suitable for you.