Xfce-Terminal vs Hyper : Which is Better?

Xfce-Terminal icon

Xfce-Terminal

Xfce Terminal was developed to fit the need for a lightweight and easy to use terminal emulator in the Xfce desktop environment. Developed by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Nick Schermer

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux BSD Xfce

VS
VS
Hyper icon

Hyper

Hyper is a terminal emulation program capable of connecting to systems through the internet via Telnet or SSH, by Dial-Up Modem, or directly connected by a RS232 serial cable and COM port. Developed by ZEIT

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Electron / Atom Shell

Xfce-Terminal VS Hyper

Xfce-Terminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator that excels in low-resource environments, making it ideal for users who prioritize performance. In contrast, Hyper offers extensive customization through plugins and a modern aesthetic, which is more suited for developers seeking advanced features across multiple platforms.

Xfce-Terminal

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Low resource consumption
  • Simple and clean user interface
  • Good performance on low-end hardware
  • Highly customizable appearance
  • Supports basic terminal features
  • Open-source
  • Active community support
  • Integrated with the Xfce desktop environment
  • Easy to set up and use

Cons:

  • Limited cross-platform functionality
  • Fewer advanced features compared to competitors
  • Less visually appealing than modern terminals
  • Limited plugin support
  • Not suitable for heavy scripting tasks
  • Basic search functionality
  • No built-in terminal multiplexer
  • Limited customization beyond appearance
  • Less active development
  • Fewer updates than competitors

Hyper

Pros:

  • Highly customizable through plugins
  • Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
  • Supports modern web technologies
  • Rich extension ecosystem
  • Beautiful design with a modern aesthetic
  • Supports iTerm2 themes
  • Flexible configuration options
  • Good for developers needing advanced features
  • Active development and frequent updates
  • Supports multiple tabs and split panes

Cons:

  • Higher resource consumption compared to Xfce-Terminal
  • Dependency on Node.js
  • Potentially slower on lower-end machines
  • Complexity can be overwhelming for new users
  • Frequent updates may introduce instability
  • More visually intensive, which may not suit all users
  • Can be overkill for simple tasks
  • Requires additional setup for some features
  • Not as lightweight as traditional terminals
  • Can be less stable due to its reliance on web technologies

Compare Xfce-Terminal

vs
Compare Cool Retro Term and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNOME Terminal and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Guake terminal and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iTerm2 and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Konsole and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare LXTerminal and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare rxvt-unicode and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Sakura and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Terminal and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Terminator and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Terminology and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare xterm and Xfce-Terminal and decide which is most suitable for you.