Xfe vs Thunar

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Xfe icon

Xfe

Xfe is a lightweight and fast graphical file manager for the X Window System, providing essential file management operations with a focus on efficiency and customization.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Xfe and Thunar are both powerful solutions in their space. Xfe offers xfe is a lightweight and fast graphical file manager for the x window system, providing essential file management operations with a focus on efficiency and customization., while Thunar provides thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Xfe

Xfe

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Efficient dual-pane interface
Integrated console access
Low resource consumption
Supports basic file compression and preview

Limitations

User interface feels dated
Limited advanced features compared to some alternatives
Plugin ecosystem is small
Basic support for network protocols
Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare