GitBucket icon

Top Alternatives to GitBucket

Looking for GitBucket alternatives? We've curated 19 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Categories:
Platforms:
GitHub

GitHub

Freemium

GitHub is the leading web-based platform for version control and collaboration, built around the Git version control system. It empowers developers and teams to host, manage, and review code, track issues, and build software together in an efficient and transparent manner.

Key Features

  • Industry-leading platform for version control.
  • Excellent collaboration features like pull requests and code review.
  • Comprehensive issue tracking and project management capabilities.

vs GitBucket

Industry-leading platform for version control. compared to GitBucket
Redmine

Redmine

Open Source

Redmine is a robust and flexible open-source project management web application designed to help teams manage projects, track issues, and collaborate effectively. It offers a wide range of features, including multi-project support, Gantt charts, time tracking, and extensive customization options through plugins and themes.

Key Features

  • Open-source and free with no licensing costs.
  • Highly customizable and extensible through plugins and themes.
  • Strong issue tracking and workflow management.

vs GitBucket

Open-source and free with no licensing costs. compared to GitBucket
Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Freemium

Bitbucket is a web-based platform offering source code management and collaboration tools for development teams. It supports Git and Mercurial, providing hosting, version control, and features like code review and issue tracking.

Key Features

  • Strong support for both Git and Mercurial.
  • Excellent integration with Jira and other Atlassian products.
  • Unlimited private repositories for small teams on the free plan.

vs GitBucket

Strong support for both Git and Mercurial. compared to GitBucket
GitLab

GitLab

Open Source

GitLab is a comprehensive web-based platform for the complete DevOps lifecycle, offering a single application from project planning and source code management to CI/CD, monitoring, and security.

Key Features

  • All-in-one platform for DevOps lifecycle reduces toolchain complexity.
  • Integrated CI/CD pipelines are powerful and easy to define within the repository.
  • Strong Git repository management with robust code review features.

vs GitBucket

All-in-one platform for DevOps lifecycle reduces toolchain complexity. compared to GitBucket
SourceForge

SourceForge is a comprehensive platform providing open-source software developers with integrated tools for version control, issue tracking, project management, and collaboration. It serves as a central hub for hosting and managing FOSS projects.

Key Features

  • Free for open-source projects
  • Supports multiple version control systems (Git, SVN, Mercurial, CVS)
  • Integrated tools for development, project management, and community

vs GitBucket

Free for open-source projects compared to GitBucket
Yodiz

Yodiz

Freemium

Yodiz is a comprehensive agile project management suite offering robust tools for Scrum and Kanban methodologies. It provides visual boards for all key agile artifacts like Sprints, Releases, Backlog, Epics, and Issue tracking, making it easy for teams to visualize and manage their workflow effectively.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive features for both Scrum and Kanban.
  • Visual boards provide excellent workflow visibility.
  • Robust and customizable issue tracking.

vs GitBucket

Comprehensive features for both Scrum and Kanban. compared to GitBucket
Launchpad

Launchpad

Open Source

Launchpad is a comprehensive platform designed for developing, managing, and maintaining software projects, with a strong emphasis on open-source collaboration. It provides tools for code hosting, bug tracking, code review, localization, and project management, fostering a vibrant community around software development.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive suite for open-source development.
  • Integrated bug tracking and code hosting.
  • Excellent localization support.

vs GitBucket

Comprehensive suite for open-source development. compared to GitBucket
Ubirimi

Ubirimi

Commercial

Ubirimi is a comprehensive project management and collaboration platform designed for software development teams. It offers robust tools for planning, tracking, and launching products, including features for issue tracking, version control integration, agile methodologies, and team communication.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive integration of project management, issue tracking, and version control.
  • Supports both Kanban and Scrum agile methodologies.
  • Seamless integration with Git, SVN, and Mercurial.

vs GitBucket

Comprehensive integration of project management, issue tracking, and version control. compared to GitBucket
Ora

Ora

Commercial

Ora is a comprehensive, real-time project management platform designed for teams of all sizes. It offers a flexible and intuitive interface, enabling teams to manage tasks, track time, collaborate effectively, and streamline workflows within a single workspace. From agile methodologies to traditional project planning, Ora provides the tools necessary to enhance productivity and achieve project goals.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive feature set covering task management, time tracking, and collaboration.
  • Supports multiple project management methodologies (Kanban, Gantt, Sprints).
  • Real-time collaboration and communication tools enhance team connectivity.

vs GitBucket

Comprehensive feature set covering task management, time tracking, and collaboration. compared to GitBucket
Gogs (Go Git Service)

Gogs (Go Git Service)

Open Source

Gogs (Go Git Service) is a lightweight, self-hosted Git service designed for ease of installation and minimal resource consumption. It provides a user-friendly web interface for managing Git repositories with features like code review, issue tracking, and user management, making it an ideal choice for small teams and developers looking for a simple yet functional Git server.

Key Features

  • Extremely easy to install and configure.
  • Very lightweight and efficient on resources.
  • Simple and intuitive web interface.

vs GitBucket

Extremely easy to install and configure. compared to GitBucket
Assembla

Assembla

Freemium

Assembla is a comprehensive platform for software development teams, offering robust version control hosting (SVN, Perforce, Git), agile project management tools, and collaboration features. It streamlines workflows, tracks tasks, and provides insights for efficient project delivery.

Key Features

  • Excellent hosting for SVN and Perforce, catering to specific needs.
  • Integrated platform for version control and project management saves time.
  • Strong support for agile methodologies with Kanban and Scrum tools.

vs GitBucket

Excellent hosting for SVN and Perforce, catering to specific needs. compared to GitBucket
Kallithea

Kallithea

Open Source

Kallithea is a free and open-source source code management system designed to provide collaborative version control for both Mercurial and Git repositories. It offers robust features for hosting, managing, and reviewing code within a team environment.

Key Features

  • Supports both Git and Mercurial concurrently.
  • Free and open-source with no licensing costs.
  • Provides granular access control.

vs GitBucket

Supports both Git and Mercurial concurrently. compared to GitBucket
Codebase

Codebase

Freemium

Codebase is a robust code hosting and project management platform for professional development teams, offering seamless integration with Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, alongside powerful tools for issue tracking, collaboration, and automated deployment.

Key Features

  • Supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion simultaneously.
  • Includes integrated issue tracking and project management tools.
  • Offers unlimited private repositories for secure code hosting.

vs GitBucket

Supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion simultaneously. compared to GitBucket
RhodeCode

RhodeCode

Freemium

RhodeCode is a self-hosted platform designed for secure, behind-the-firewall source code management. It provides comprehensive support for Git and Mercurial repositories, offering a robust solution for teams requiring control over their development infrastructure.

Key Features

  • Supports both Git and Mercurial in a single platform.
  • Self-hosted for enhanced security and control.
  • Offers unlimited private repositories.

vs GitBucket

Supports both Git and Mercurial in a single platform. compared to GitBucket
Springloops

Springloops

Freemium

Springloops is a powerful web-based version control and deployment service tailored for web developers. Supporting Git and Subversion, it offers integrated code collaboration, automated deployments, and a user-friendly interface to streamline development workflows from code commit to production.

Key Features

  • Integrated version control and deployment
  • Unlimited private repositories
  • Supports Git, SVN, and Mercurial

vs GitBucket

Integrated version control and deployment compared to GitBucket
Beanstalk

Beanstalk

Commercial

Beanstalk is a comprehensive, cloud-based solution for teams to manage their code lifecycle, offering integrated version control (Git and SVN), collaborative workflows, and automated deployment capabilities.

Key Features

  • Unified platform for version control, code review, and deployment.
  • Supports both Git and SVN repositories.
  • User-friendly automated deployment features.

vs GitBucket

Unified platform for version control, code review, and deployment. compared to GitBucket
Gitblit

Gitblit

Open Source

Gitblit is an open-source, pure Java stack designed for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It offers a lightweight yet powerful platform with a web interface for collaboration and project management.

Key Features

  • Pure Java, highly portable and easy to deploy.
  • Lightweight with low resource requirements.
  • Unlimited private repositories.

vs GitBucket

Pure Java, highly portable and easy to deploy. compared to GitBucket
Unfuddle

Unfuddle

Commercial

Unfuddle is a comprehensive platform for agile software development teams, offering integrated tools for bug and issue tracking, Git and Subversion hosting, and team collaboration. It provides a centralized environment to manage the entire development lifecycle.

Key Features

  • Integrated platform for version control, issue tracking, and collaboration.
  • Supports both Git and Subversion.
  • Features specifically designed for agile development teams.

vs GitBucket

Integrated platform for version control, issue tracking, and collaboration. compared to GitBucket
GitPrep

GitPrep

Open Source

GitPrep is a portable, self-hosted GitHub clone designed for managing Git repositories with features like forking, code review, and wiki support. It offers unlimited private repositories and integrates with various development tools.

Key Features

  • Portable and easy to deploy on various infrastructure.
  • Offers unlimited private repositories.
  • Includes essential collaboration features like forking and code review.

vs GitBucket

Portable and easy to deploy on various infrastructure. compared to GitBucket

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how GitBucket stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare