Signal icon

Signal Alternatives for Windows

Looking for Signal alternatives? We've curated 25 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need Windows options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Telegram

Telegram

Free

Telegram is a fast and secure cloud-based instant messaging platform offering robust privacy features, large group support, file sharing, and cross-platform synchronization, making it a versatile communication tool.

Key Features

  • Strong focus on privacy and security features.
  • Fast and reliable message delivery, even on weak networks.
  • Generous file size limit and cloud storage.

vs Signal

Strong focus on privacy and security features. compared to Signal
Tox

Tox

Open Source

Tox is a free, open-source, and secure peer-to-peer instant messaging and video calling protocol designed for strong privacy and censorship resistance. It provides end-to-end encrypted communications without reliance on central servers.

Key Features

  • Decentralized architecture enhances privacy and censorship resistance.
  • End-to-end encryption for all communication types by default.
  • No central servers mean no central point of failure or data collection.

vs Signal

Decentralized architecture enhances privacy and censorship resistance. compared to Signal
Trillian

Trillian

Freemium

Trillian is a versatile, multi-protocol instant messaging client that unifies various communication platforms like IRC, XMPP, and more into a single, user-friendly interface. It's designed for both personal and team collaboration, offering features like encrypted chats, group collaboration tools, and extensive customization options.

Key Features

  • Unifies multiple chat services into one application.
  • Supports a wide range of messaging protocols.
  • Includes features for team collaboration.

vs Signal

Unifies multiple chat services into one application. compared to Signal
Jitsi

Jitsi

Open Source

Jitsi is a free and open-source suite of secure, flexible communication tools. It offers multi-platform support for voice (VoIP), video conferencing, and instant messaging, emphasizing privacy and ease of use with no account required to start a meeting.

Key Features

  • Free and open source.
  • No account required for quick meetings.
  • Browser-based access, no download needed.

vs Signal

Free and open source. compared to Signal
Imo

Imo

Free

Imo is a free instant messaging and video calling application designed for global reach, prioritizing reliability, particularly in regions with unstable network conditions. It offers features like voice and video calls, chat, group messaging, and various multimedia sharing options.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance on low-bandwidth networks.
  • Reliable voice and video call quality in challenging conditions.
  • Lightweight and resource-efficient.

vs Signal

Excellent performance on low-bandwidth networks. compared to Signal
Linphone

Linphone

Open Source

Linphone is a free and open-source Voice over IP (VoIP) application and SIP client available on multiple platforms. It enables encrypted voice and video calls, instant messaging, and file sharing, offering a privacy-focused communication solution.

Key Features

  • Free and open-source with strong privacy features
  • Supports end-to-end encryption for calls and chat
  • SIP standard compliant, allowing connection to various VoIP providers

vs Signal

Free and open-source with strong privacy features compared to Signal
LINE

LINE

Freemium

LINE is a versatile communication platform offering free voice and video calls, messaging, and a wide array of interactive features to connect with friends and family globally. It goes beyond basic chat with unique stickers, timeline posts, and integration with various services, providing a comprehensive social and communication experience in one app.

Key Features

  • Free voice and video calls globally.
  • Large and expressive sticker collection.
  • Features like Timeline and Public Groups enhance social interaction.

vs Signal

Free voice and video calls globally. compared to Signal
RetroShare

RetroShare

Open Source

RetroShare is a secure, decentralized, and open-source communication platform built on a friend-to-friend network, offering encrypted file sharing, serverless email, instant messaging, and forums.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on privacy and security through end-to-end encryption.
  • Decentralized friend-to-friend network architecture eliminates central servers.
  • Offers a comprehensive suite of communication tools (messaging, email, voice, video).

vs Signal

Strong emphasis on privacy and security through end-to-end encryption. compared to Signal
Wire

Wire

Free

Wire is a secure, cross-platform messaging and collaboration client offering end-to-end encryption by default for all communication types including messaging, voice and video calls, and file sharing across desktop and mobile devices.

Key Features

  • Strong, always-on end-to-end encryption for all communication.
  • Available on multiple platforms including desktop and mobile.
  • Open source code for transparency and security auditing.

vs Signal

Strong, always-on end-to-end encryption for all communication. compared to Signal
Ring

Ring

Open Source

Ring (SFLphone) is a free and open-source communication platform offering secure messaging, voice, and video calls. It leverages decentralization and end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy across multiple operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, and Android.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on privacy and security with end-to-end encryption.
  • Decentralized architecture increases resilience and prevents central control.
  • Open-source and free to use.

vs Signal

Strong emphasis on privacy and security with end-to-end encryption. compared to Signal
ICQ

ICQ

Free

ICQ is a veteran instant messaging platform offering a wide range of communication features, including text chat, voice and video calls, screen sharing, and group chats. It aims to provide a reliable and feature-rich messaging experience with a focus on privacy and security.

Key Features

  • Offers end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy.
  • Provides voice and video calling features.
  • Supports group chats with threaded conversations.

vs Signal

Offers end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy. compared to Signal
WeChat

WeChat

Freemium

WeChat is a comprehensive mobile app offering instant messaging, social networking, payment services, and access to a wide range of mini-programs. It facilitates communication through text, voice, and video, supports group interactions, and integrates various lifestyle services.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive feature set including messaging, social, and payments.
  • Wide adoption and essential for communication and commerce in many regions.
  • Mini-programs offer access to numerous services without separate app installations.

vs Signal

Comprehensive feature set including messaging, social, and payments. compared to Signal
Bitmessage

Bitmessage

Open Source

Bitmessage is an open-source peer-to-peer encrypted messaging system designed to provide robust privacy and security. It operates without central servers, ensuring decentralized communication and offering anonymity by design. Ideal for those prioritizing secure and private digital interactions, it leverages strong encryption to protect messages from eavesdropping.

Key Features

  • Highly resistant to censorship and surveillance due to decentralized nature.
  • End-to-end encryption ensures message content privacy.
  • No central server means no single point of failure or control.

vs Signal

Highly resistant to censorship and surveillance due to decentralized nature. compared to Signal
Matrix.org

Matrix.org

Open Source

Matrix is an open network for secure, decentralized real-time communication. It provides a flexible protocol for developers to build collaborative applications like instant messaging, VoIP, and video conferencing, enabling seamless communication across different service providers.

Key Features

  • Decentralized architecture increases resilience and prevents single points of failure.
  • Strong emphasis on end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy and security.
  • Open standard and protocol fosters innovation and avoids vendor lock-in.

vs Signal

Decentralized architecture increases resilience and prevents single points of failure. compared to Signal
Torchat

Torchat

Open Source

TorChat is a defunct decentralized anonymous instant messenger leveraging Tor hidden services for secure text communication and file sharing without central servers.

Key Features

  • Strong anonymity through deep Tor integration.
  • Truly decentralized, no central servers.
  • Portable, leaves minimal trace on host systems.

vs Signal

Strong anonymity through deep Tor integration. compared to Signal
KakaoTalk

KakaoTalk

Freemium

KakaoTalk is a popular mobile messaging service offering free text, voice, and video calls. Primarily used in South Korea, it provides a comprehensive communication platform with features like group chats, stickers, and a strong emphasis on user privacy and security.

Key Features

  • Free voice and video calls
  • Comprehensive group chat features
  • Engaging sticker collection

vs Signal

Free voice and video calls compared to Signal
Blink

Blink

Freemium

Blink is a robust, real-time communications client leveraging the SIP protocol for secure and private instant messaging, voice, and video calls. It emphasizes features like end-to-end encryption, file sharing, and screen sharing across various platforms.

Key Features

  • Strong end-to-end encryption for privacy.
  • Based on the open and decentralized SIP protocol.
  • Includes comprehensive communication features (voice, video, chat).

vs Signal

Strong end-to-end encryption for privacy. compared to Signal
Bit Chat

Bit Chat

Open Source

Bit Chat is a secure, open-source, peer-to-peer instant messenger platform that prioritizes user privacy and security through robust end-to-end encryption and a decentralized network architecture. It empowers users with direct, encrypted communication, bypassing central servers and enhancing resistance to surveillance and censorship.

Key Features

  • True peer-to-peer architecture enhances privacy and resilience.
  • Robust end-to-end encryption for all communication.
  • Open-source code enables security audits and builds trust.

vs Signal

True peer-to-peer architecture enhances privacy and resilience. compared to Signal
Coccinella

Coccinella

Open Source

Coccinella is a free and open-source, cross-platform XMPP/Jabber client. It offers secure instant messaging, group chat, voice chat, and a unique interactive whiteboard feature. Designed with privacy and security in mind, Coccinella provides encrypted communications and supports various communication protocols for a flexible messaging experience on Windows, macOS, and Linux.

Key Features

  • Strong focus on security and privacy with end-to-end encryption.
  • Supports the decentralized XMPP protocol.
  • Includes a unique interactive whiteboard feature.

vs Signal

Strong focus on security and privacy with end-to-end encryption. compared to Signal
Zulip

Zulip

Open Source

Zulip is a powerful open-source group chat application designed for team collaboration. It uniquely structures conversations around topics, enabling users to easily catch up on important discussions and manage information overload. Zulip facilitates secure communication with integrated file sharing and various integrations.

Key Features

  • Excellent at organizing complex conversations with its unique topic-based structure.
  • Helps in managing information overload compared to flat chat systems.
  • Open-source and offers a self-hosting option for greater data control and privacy.

vs Signal

Excellent at organizing complex conversations with its unique topic-based structure. compared to Signal
Dialog Messenger

Dialog Messenger

Free Personal

Dialog Messenger is a robust, feature-rich enterprise messaging solution designed for businesses prioritizing security, privacy, and control. Available for both private server deployment and cloud hosting, it facilitates secure text, voice, and video communication across multiple devices, enabling seamless collaboration and real-time interaction within organizations.

Key Features

  • Strong focus on security and privacy with encryption and self-hosting options.
  • Provides complete control over data for compliance and sovereignty.
  • Includes essential communication features like text, voice, and video chat.

vs Signal

Strong focus on security and privacy with encryption and self-hosting options. compared to Signal
Wickr

Wickr

Free

Wickr is a secure and private instant messaging platform designed for individuals and teams who prioritize confidentiality. It offers end-to-end encryption, self-destructing messages, and a focus on anonymity to ensure that conversations and shared data remain protected.

Key Features

  • Strong end-to-end encryption for all communication types.
  • Self-destructing messages offer control over data lifespan.
  • Emphasis on user anonymity and minimal metadata collection.

vs Signal

Strong end-to-end encryption for all communication types. compared to Signal
Ricochet

Ricochet

Open Source

Ricochet is a peer-to-peer instant messaging application designed for maximum privacy and anonymity. It leverages the Tor network to connect users directly, eliminating the need for central servers and reducing metadata leakage.

Key Features

  • Highly resistant to surveillance and censorship due to serverless and Tor-based design.
  • Excellent anonymity features, masking user identity and location.
  • End-to-end encryption ensures message content privacy.

vs Signal

Highly resistant to surveillance and censorship due to serverless and Tor-based design. compared to Signal
Pidgin-Encryption

Pidgin-Encryption

Open Source

Pidgin-Encryption is a plugin for the popular Pidgin instant messaging client that provides transparent, end-to-end encryption for your conversations using RSA.

Key Features

  • Provides strong end-to-end encryption for Pidgin.
  • Transparent operation after initial setup.
  • Utilizes the well-regarded RSA algorithm.

vs Signal

Provides strong end-to-end encryption for Pidgin. compared to Signal
YakYak

YakYak

Open Source

YakYak is an unofficial desktop client for Google Hangouts, providing a dedicated application experience outside of a web browser with features focused on convenience and improved usability.

Key Features

  • Provides a dedicated desktop application for Google Hangouts.
  • Offers native system notifications for incoming messages.
  • Portable option available, no installation required.

vs Signal

Provides a dedicated desktop application for Google Hangouts. compared to Signal

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Signal stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare