Adobe Dreamweaver vs Microsoft Expression Web : Which is Better?

Adobe Dreamweaver icon

Adobe Dreamweaver

Adobe Dreamweaver is a web development tool developed by Adobe Systems. Developed by Adobe

License: Commercial

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows

VS
VS
Microsoft Expression Web icon

Microsoft Expression Web

Microsoft Expression Web, code-named Quartz, is an HTML editor and general web design software. Developed by Microsoft Corp.

License: Free

Apps available for Windows .NET Framework Discontinued

Adobe Dreamweaver VS Microsoft Expression Web

Adobe Dreamweaver offers a comprehensive set of features, including responsive design tools and strong integration with Adobe Creative Cloud, making it more suitable for modern web development. In contrast, Microsoft Expression Web is more beginner-friendly and cost-effective, but it lacks many advanced features and support for modern web standards.

Adobe Dreamweaver

Pros:

  • Comprehensive visual and code editing capabilities
  • Strong support for modern web standards
  • Integration with Adobe Creative Cloud
  • Robust FTP and SFTP support
  • Prebuilt templates for quick start
  • Live preview feature for immediate feedback
  • Great for responsive design
  • Extensive community and resources available
  • Regular updates and feature enhancements
  • Support for various frameworks

Cons:

  • Higher cost compared to competitors
  • Can be overwhelming for beginners
  • Requires a subscription for full features
  • Heavy software that may require robust system specs
  • Limited support for older technologies
  • May not be the best for simple projects
  • Complexity can hinder quick tasks
  • Not as beginner-friendly as some alternatives
  • Dependency on Adobe ecosystem
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced features

Microsoft Expression Web

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface for beginners
  • Strong support for older technologies
  • Stable performance
  • Good integration with Microsoft products
  • Ease of use for basic web design tasks
  • Cost-effective compared to Adobe Dreamweaver
  • Simpler learning curve for new users
  • Basic debugging tools available
  • Suitable for legacy projects
  • Integrated with Microsoft Visual Studio

Cons:

  • Limited support for modern web standards
  • Lacks some advanced features found in competitors
  • No responsive design tools
  • Limited integration with third-party tools
  • Less frequent updates and support
  • Not suitable for complex web applications
  • Limited customization options
  • Fewer prebuilt templates available
  • Less community support compared to Adobe products
  • Not ideal for professional web developers

Compare Adobe Dreamweaver

vs
Compare Amaya and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Aptana Studio and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bluefish Editor and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BlueGriffon and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bootstrap Studio and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Brackets and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Coda and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CodeLobster PHP Edition and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CSSEdit and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Espresso and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Flux and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare HTML-Kit and Adobe Dreamweaver and decide which is most suitable for you.