Construct 3 vs Stencyl

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Construct 3 icon

Construct 3

Construct 3 is a powerful, browser-based 2D game engine that empowers creators of all skill levels to develop compelling games without writing a single line of code. Its intuitive visual editor and event system make game creation accessible and efficient. by Scirra Ltd.

Commercial
Platforms: Mac Windows Linux Android iPhone Chrome OS Android Tablet iPad
Screenshots:
VS
Stencyl icon

Stencyl

Stencyl is an intuitive game creation toolkit that empowers individuals to design and publish 2D games across multiple platforms including desktop, web, and mobile, without requiring traditional coding expertise. by Stencyl LLC

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Construct 3 and Stencyl are both powerful solutions in their space. Construct 3 offers construct 3 is a powerful, browser-based 2d game engine that empowers creators of all skill levels to develop compelling games without writing a single line of code. its intuitive visual editor and event system make game creation accessible and efficient., while Stencyl provides stencyl is an intuitive game creation toolkit that empowers individuals to design and publish 2d games across multiple platforms including desktop, web, and mobile, without requiring traditional coding expertise.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Construct 3

Construct 3

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent for 2D game development without coding.
Browser-based and accessible from any device.
Intuitive visual programming system.
Wide range of export options (web, desktop, mobile).
Strong ecosystem with plugins and behaviors.

Limitations

Subscription-based pricing.
Can become complex for extremely large projects.
Debugging might be less granular than traditional code.
Stencyl

Stencyl

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Visual drag-and-drop programming eliminates the need for traditional coding.
Supports cross-platform publishing to desktop, web, and mobile.
Integrated editors for scenes, actors, and animations streamline workflow.
Good for learning game development concepts.
Active community and useful online resources available.

Limitations

Performance can be a concern for very complex games, especially on older devices.
Debugging complex block-based behaviors can sometimes be challenging.
Reliance on Flash for web export is becoming less relevant.
Mobile export can sometimes require platform-specific adjustments.
User interface can feel a bit dated compared to some newer tools.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare