CouchDB VS PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is a relational database that excels in structured data management with strong ACID compliance and SQL support, making it suitable for transactional applications. In contrast, CouchDB is a NoSQL document store that offers schema flexibility and horizontal scaling, making it ideal for applications requiring quick iterations and handling large volumes of unstructured data.
CouchDB
Pros:
- Schema-less design for flexibility
- Designed for horizontal scaling
- Great for document storage
- Built-in replication features
- Good for web applications
Cons:
- Lacks ACID transactions
- Limited query capabilities compared to SQL
- Not ideal for complex queries
- Higher overhead for certain operations
PostgreSQL
Pros:
- Strong ACID compliance
- Robust SQL support
- Rich indexing options
- Active community support
- Versatile data types including JSON
Cons:
- Less flexible schema design
- Not optimized for horizontal scaling
- More complex setup for distributed systems
- Can be slower for large unstructured data
Compare CouchDB
Compare Apache Cassandra and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GridGain In-Memory Data Fabric and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare H2 Database Engine and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Microsoft SQL Server and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MySQL Community Edition and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
