Editra VS Aquamacs Emacs Feature comparision
| Feature | Editra | Aquamacs Emacs |
|---|---|---|
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Python | ||
| Developer Tools | ||
| Code completion | ||
| Embedded debugger | ||
| Intellisense | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Java IDE | ||
| Beauty and fluid interface | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| EMACS | ||
| Java | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes |
Compare Editra
Compare Bloodshed Dev-C++ and Editra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and Editra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Code::Blocks and Editra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare EditPad Lite and Editra and decide which is most suitable for you.
