Evince vs zathura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Evince icon

Evince

Evince is a lightweight and versatile document viewer designed for various formats including PDF, PostScript, DjVu, TIFF, XPS, and DVI. It provides a clean and intuitive interface for easily accessing and navigating your documents. by The GNOME Project

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux PortableApps.com
Screenshots:
VS
zathura icon

zathura

Zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the Poppler rendering engine. It is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings. by pwmt.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Evince and zathura are both powerful solutions in their space. Evince offers evince is a lightweight and versatile document viewer designed for various formats including pdf, postscript, djvu, tiff, xps, and dvi. it provides a clean and intuitive interface for easily accessing and navigating your documents., while zathura provides zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the poppler rendering engine. it is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Evince

Evince

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide variety of document formats (PDF, PS, DjVu, TIFF, XPS, DVI).
Extremely lightweight and uses minimal system resources.
Provides fast loading and smooth navigation.
Clean and easy-to-use interface.
Includes basic PDF highlighting capabilities.

Limitations

Lacks advanced PDF editing features.
Annotation features are limited.
No support for filling interactive PDF forms.
zathura

zathura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Excellent keyboard navigation for efficient browsing.
Highly customizable through a simple configuration file.
Minimalistic and clean user interface.
Low memory usage makes it suitable for older systems.
Supports multiple document formats via backends.

Limitations

Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with keyboard shortcuts.
Lacks advanced features found in mainstream viewers (e.g., comprehensive annotation, form filling).
Configuration requires editing a text file.
No graphical menus or toolbars for easy access to options.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare