Furmark vs Cinebench : Which is Better?
Furmark
FurMark is a very intensive OpenGL benchmark that uses fur rendering algorithms to measure the performance of the graphics card. Developed by Jerome 'JeGX' GUINOT
License: Free
VS
VS
Furmark VS Cinebench
Furmark is primarily a GPU stress testing tool, focusing on graphics performance and stability, while Cinebench is designed for CPU benchmarking, evaluating multi-threading and rendering capabilities. Furmark excels at pushing GPUs to their limits, whereas Cinebench provides a comprehensive assessment of CPU performance across various workloads.
Furmark
Pros:
- Specializes in GPU stress testing
- Provides real-time monitoring of temperature and performance
- Offers a simple user interface for beginners
- Widely used in the GPU overclocking community
- Free to use with no limitations on features
Cons:
- Does not benchmark CPU performance
- Limited to Windows platform
- Lacks extensive community resources compared to Cinebench
- Primarily focused on stress testing rather than general performance
Cinebench
Pros:
- Excellent for CPU benchmarking
- Supports multi-threading for comprehensive testing
- Provides detailed score reports and output formats
- Cross-platform compatibility
- Strong community support with plenty of resources
Cons:
- Less effective for GPU performance testing
- Complex user interface for beginners
- Requires more system resources during testing
- Not ideal for real-time monitoring of performance
Compare Furmark
Compare PerformanceTest and Furmark and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare UNIGINE Benchmarks and Furmark and decide which is most suitable for you.