Haskell vs C (programming language) : Which is Better?

Haskell icon

Haskell

Haskell is a standardized, general-purpose purely functional programming language, with non-strict semantics and strong static typing.

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

VS
VS
C (programming language) icon

C (programming language)

C is a general-purpose, imperative computer programming language, supporting structured programming. Developed by Dennis Ritchie & Bell Labs

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD AROS

Haskell VS C (programming language)

Haskell is a purely functional programming language with strong static typing and lazy evaluation, making it suitable for high-level abstractions and concurrency. In contrast, C is a procedural language that offers low-level memory control and high performance, making it ideal for system programming and embedded systems.

Haskell

Pros:

  • Strong static type system
  • Lazy evaluation
  • High level of abstraction
  • Powerful concurrency support
  • Rich type inference
  • Concise syntax
  • Immutable data structures
  • Functional programming paradigm
  • Extensive library support
  • Good community resources

Cons:

  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited performance for certain tasks
  • Less control over memory
  • Not suitable for system-level programming
  • Runtime overhead due to lazy evaluation
  • Less efficient for low-level tasks
  • Limited practical applications compared to C
  • Less community support in some areas
  • Debugging can be complex
  • Less flexible for certain paradigms

C (programming language)

Pros:

  • Low-level memory control
  • High performance and efficiency
  • Widely used in system programming
  • Extensive libraries and frameworks
  • Strong community support
  • Interoperable with many languages
  • Simple syntax
  • Good for embedded systems
  • Real-time system capabilities
  • Large ecosystem

Cons:

  • Manual memory management
  • Verbose and complex syntax
  • Lack of modern features (e.g., generics)
  • More prone to bugs (e.g., buffer overflows)
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Longer development time for complex applications
  • Less focus on concurrency
  • Limited support for functional programming
  • Error-prone due to manual resource management
  • Lower abstraction level

Compare Haskell

vs
Compare ASP.NET and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare C# and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Clojure and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare C++ and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare D (Programming Language) and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Dart and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Erlang and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare F# (programming language) and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Go (Programming Language) and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Hack and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Haxe and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Java and Haskell and decide which is most suitable for you.