Haskell icon

Top Alternatives to Haskell

Looking for Haskell alternatives? We've curated 21 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Categories:
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs Haskell

Easy to learn and read. compared to Haskell
PHP

PHP

Open Source

PHP is a versatile, open-source scripting language widely used for web development. It excels at creating dynamic web content, interacting with databases, and integrating seamlessly with HTML.

Key Features

  • Large and active community with extensive resources.
  • Mature and well-documented with numerous frameworks.
  • Strong database integration capabilities.

vs Haskell

Large and active community with extensive resources. compared to Haskell
C (programming language)

C is a foundational, imperative programming language renowned for its efficiency and low-level access. It serves as a bedrock for systems programming, operating systems, and performance-critical applications, providing direct control over hardware through features like manual memory management.

Key Features

  • High performance due to direct compilation to machine code.
  • Provides low-level control over memory and hardware.
  • Excellent for systems programming and embedded development.

vs Haskell

High performance due to direct compilation to machine code. compared to Haskell
C++

C++

Open Source

C++ is a powerful, general-purpose programming language renowned for its performance and flexibility. It supports procedural, object-oriented, generic, and functional programming paradigms, making it suitable for a wide range of applications from system software to video games.

Key Features

  • Exceptional performance and efficiency due to low-level control.
  • Supports multiple programming paradigms for flexibility.
  • Comprehensive and highly optimized standard library.

vs Haskell

Exceptional performance and efficiency due to low-level control. compared to Haskell
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs Haskell

Elegant and readable syntax compared to Haskell
Lua

Lua

Open Source

Lua is a powerful, fast, and lightweight scripting language designed for embedding in applications. It's known for its simplicity, portability, and efficiency, making it ideal for a wide range of uses from embedded systems to game development and configuration.

Key Features

  • Extremely lightweight and fast
  • Easy to embed into other applications
  • Simple and easy-to-learn syntax

vs Haskell

Extremely lightweight and fast compared to Haskell
Dart

Dart

Open Source

Dart is an open-source, client-optimized programming language for building fast apps on any platform. It offers a productive development experience and high performance.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter.
  • Strong tooling and features like hot-reload boost developer productivity.
  • Flexible compilation to native code or JavaScript for performance and reach.

vs Haskell

Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter. compared to Haskell
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs Haskell

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to Haskell
Rust

Rust

Open Source

Rust is a multi-paradigm, general-purpose programming language designed for performance and safety, especially safe concurrency. It's ideal for systems programming and performance-critical applications.

Key Features

  • Guaranteed memory safety without garbage collection.
  • Excellent performance, comparable to C/C++.
  • Fearless concurrency due to language design.

vs Haskell

Guaranteed memory safety without garbage collection. compared to Haskell
D (Programming Language)

D is a general-purpose systems and application programming language that aims to combine the power and high performance of C++ with the productivity and safety of modern languages like Python or Ruby.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance comparable to C/C++.
  • Strong safety features reduce common programming errors.
  • Modern language features enhance developer productivity.

vs Haskell

Excellent performance comparable to C/C++. compared to Haskell
Haxe

Haxe

Open Source

Haxe is a versatile open-source programming language and compiler that lets developers write code once and deploy it across numerous platforms, including web (JavaScript, Node.js), mobile (iOS, Android), desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), servers, and even game consoles.

Key Features

  • Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase.
  • Strong static typing improves code reliability.
  • Powerful macro system for advanced code generation.

vs Haskell

Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase. compared to Haskell
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs Haskell

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to Haskell
Erlang

Erlang

Open Source

Erlang is a powerful functional programming language designed for building highly available, scalable, and fault-tolerant soft real-time systems. It excels in concurrent and distributed environments, making it ideal for applications requiring continuous uptime and handling vast amounts of concurrent requests.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building highly concurrent and distributed applications.
  • Superior fault tolerance and resilience built into the language.
  • Allows for high availability through hot code swapping.

vs Haskell

Excellent for building highly concurrent and distributed applications. compared to Haskell
ASP.NET

ASP.NET

Free

ASP.NET is a robust, open-source framework developed by Microsoft for building modern web applications, APIs, and microservices. It supports diverse development models and provides powerful tools for creating dynamic, data-driven websites.

Key Features

  • High performance and scalability
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Strong tooling support with Visual Studio and VS Code

vs Haskell

High performance and scalability compared to Haskell
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs Haskell

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to Haskell
Clojure

Clojure

Open Source

Clojure is a dynamic, functional dialect of the Lisp programming language on the Java virtual machine (JVM). It emphasizes immutability and persistent data structures for robust concurrent programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent support for concurrent programming due to immutability and built-in features.
  • Runs on the JVM, providing access to a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools.
  • Powerful macro system allows for highly expressive and extensible code.

vs Haskell

Excellent support for concurrent programming due to immutability and built-in features. compared to Haskell
Tcl

Tcl

Open Source

Tcl (Tool Command Language) is a dynamic, high-level scripting language ideal for rapid application development, scripting, and automation, particularly strong in graphical user interfaces.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting.
  • Integrated and powerful Tk toolkit for GUI development.
  • Excellent cross-platform compatibility.

vs Haskell

Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting. compared to Haskell
Kotlin

Kotlin

Open Source

Kotlin is a modern, statically-typed programming language developed by JetBrains. It runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), Android, and the web (via JavaScript), and can compile to native code. Designed for concise, safe, and interoperable code, Kotlin aims to make programming more enjoyable and productive.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors.
  • More concise and expressive syntax compared to Java, leading to faster development and improved readability.
  • Excellent interoperability with Java, allowing smooth integration into existing projects.

vs Haskell

Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors. compared to Haskell
F# (programming language)

F# is an open-source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language designed for conciseness and correctness. It integrates seamlessly with the .NET ecosystem, making it ideal for data science, web development, and more.

Key Features

  • Concise and expressive syntax.
  • Strong static typing with excellent type inference.
  • Seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem and libraries.

vs Haskell

Concise and expressive syntax. compared to Haskell
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs Haskell

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to Haskell
Hack

Hack

Open Source

Hack is a programming language for the HipHop Virtual Machine (HHVM), combining the fast development cycle of dynamically typed languages with the discipline of static typing. It offers features like type hinting and asynchronous programming primitives, making it suitable for building complex, performant web applications.

Key Features

  • Improved performance through HHVM.
  • Early error detection with static typing.
  • Supports asynchronous programming for better responsiveness.

vs Haskell

Improved performance through HHVM. compared to Haskell

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Haskell stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare