LXQt vs Budgie : Which is Better?

LXQt icon

LXQt

LXQt is a bundle of software packages under development, with the aim of providing a complete desktop environment.

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux BSD

VS
VS
Budgie icon

Budgie

Budgie is a feature-rich, luxurious desktop using the most modern technologies. Developed by Solus Project

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux

LXQt VS Budgie

LXQt is a lightweight, highly customizable desktop environment ideal for older hardware and users who prioritize performance and resource efficiency. In contrast, Budgie offers a more modern, visually appealing experience with a user-friendly interface but at the cost of higher resource usage.

LXQt

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Highly customizable
  • Great for older hardware
  • Low system resource usage
  • Supports both GTK and Qt applications
  • Good community support
  • Extensive theming options
  • File manager integration is seamless
  • High performance
  • Session management features

Cons:

  • Less polished interface
  • Limited accessibility features
  • No built-in desktop widgets
  • Might require additional configuration for best performance
  • Fewer default applications compared to Budgie
  • Less visually appealing
  • Less focus on multimedia
  • Limited support for modern features
  • Not as user-friendly for beginners
  • May lack some modern design aesthetics

Budgie

Pros:

  • Modern and sleek design
  • User-friendly interface
  • Good accessibility features
  • Built-in desktop widgets
  • Rich multimedia support
  • Great window management
  • Strong community support
  • Virtual desktop support
  • Customizable panel
  • Integrated notifications system

Cons:

  • Heavier on resources compared to LXQt
  • Less customizable than LXQt
  • Limited theming options
  • May not perform well on older hardware
  • Some features may feel less intuitive
  • Requires more resources
  • Less flexible in terms of application support
  • Not as lightweight as LXQt
  • More reliant on specific GTK applications
  • Session management can be cumbersome

Compare LXQt

vs
Compare Cairo Shell and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Cinnamon and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Enlightenment and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNOME and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare KDE and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Lumina Desktop Environment and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare LXDE and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MATE and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Xfce and LXQt and decide which is most suitable for you.