MapQuest vs OpenStreetMap Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

MapQuest icon

MapQuest

MapQuest is a long-standing digital mapping service offering robust navigation, real-time traffic updates, gas prices, and point-of-interest information. It serves as a comprehensive tool for planning routes and navigating various destinations. by MapQuest, Inc

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Online Android iPhone Windows Phone Kindle Fire
VS
OpenStreetMap icon

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a global, collaborative project to create a free, editable map of the world. It's built upon data contributed by millions of volunteers, offering a highly detailed and up-to-date alternative to commercial mapping services.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Online

Summary

MapQuest and OpenStreetMap are both powerful solutions in their space. MapQuest offers mapquest is a long-standing digital mapping service offering robust navigation, real-time traffic updates, gas prices, and point-of-interest information. it serves as a comprehensive tool for planning routes and navigating various destinations., while OpenStreetMap provides openstreetmap (osm) is a global, collaborative project to create a free, editable map of the world. it's built upon data contributed by millions of volunteers, offering a highly detailed and up-to-date alternative to commercial mapping services.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MapQuest

MapQuest

Pros

  • Reliable turn-by-turn navigation and voice guidance.
  • Effective real-time traffic information for optimal routing.
  • Integrated gas price finder is a convenient feature.
  • Extensive points of interest database.
  • Simple and user-friendly interface.

Cons

  • Offline map functionality may not be as robust as dedicated offline apps.
  • Lacks some advanced customization options found in competitors.
OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap

Pros

  • Free and open data access
  • Highly detailed and locale-specific information in well-mapped areas
  • Active and dedicated community of contributors
  • Supports a wide range of third-party applications and services
  • Continuously updated and improved

Cons

  • Data consistency can vary geographically
  • Primary website interface can be less intuitive for casual users
  • Advanced features often rely on third-party applications
  • Learning curve for contributing complex data

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare