MediaTomb vs MiniDLNA

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MediaTomb icon

MediaTomb

MediaTomb is a free, open-source UPnP MediaServer designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart TVs, game consoles, and other UPnP/DLNA clients.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux
VS
MiniDLNA icon

MiniDLNA

MiniDLNA, now ReadyMedia, is a lightweight and simple media server designed for full compliance with DLNA/UPnP-AV clients. It allows streaming multimedia content stored on your network to compatible devices such as smart TVs, game consoles, and mobile devices.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux

Comparison Summary

MediaTomb and MiniDLNA are both powerful solutions in their space. MediaTomb offers mediatomb is a free, open-source upnp mediaserver designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart tvs, game consoles, and other upnp/dlna clients., while MiniDLNA provides minidlna, now readymedia, is a lightweight and simple media server designed for full compliance with dlna/upnp-av clients. it allows streaming multimedia content stored on your network to compatible devices such as smart tvs, game consoles, and mobile devices.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MediaTomb

MediaTomb

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly configurable and flexible.
Open-source and free to use.
Supports dynamic media transcoding.
Lightweight and efficient with system resources.
Compatible with a wide range of DLNA/UPnP devices.

Limitations

Configuration can be complex for beginners.
User interface is functional but dated.
Active development has slowed down.
Requires a degree of technical knowledge for optimal setup.
MiniDLNA

MiniDLNA

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and low resource usage.
Excellent compatibility with DLNA/UPnP-AV client devices.
Simple to setup and configure through a text file.
Reliable for streaming standard media formats.
Ideal for embedded systems and low-power hardware.

Limitations

Lacks a graphical web interface for management.
Does not include advanced on-the-fly transcoding.
Metadata support is basic compared to feature-rich servers.
Configuration is command-line and file-based.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare