MiniDLNA vs MediaTomb

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MiniDLNA icon

MiniDLNA

MiniDLNA, now ReadyMedia, is a lightweight and simple media server designed for full compliance with DLNA/UPnP-AV clients. It allows streaming multimedia content stored on your network to compatible devices such as smart TVs, game consoles, and mobile devices.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Alternatives Details Website
VS
MediaTomb icon

MediaTomb

MediaTomb is a free, open-source UPnP MediaServer designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart TVs, game consoles, and other UPnP/DLNA clients.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux
Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

MiniDLNA and MediaTomb are both powerful solutions in their space. MiniDLNA offers minidlna, now readymedia, is a lightweight and simple media server designed for full compliance with dlna/upnp-av clients. it allows streaming multimedia content stored on your network to compatible devices such as smart tvs, game consoles, and mobile devices., while MediaTomb provides mediatomb is a free, open-source upnp mediaserver designed to share digital media content (video, audio, images) across a home network to compatible devices like smart tvs, game consoles, and other upnp/dlna clients.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MiniDLNA

MiniDLNA

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and low resource usage.
Excellent compatibility with DLNA/UPnP-AV client devices.
Simple to setup and configure through a text file.
Reliable for streaming standard media formats.
Ideal for embedded systems and low-power hardware.

Limitations

Lacks a graphical web interface for management.
Does not include advanced on-the-fly transcoding.
Metadata support is basic compared to feature-rich servers.
Configuration is command-line and file-based.
MediaTomb

MediaTomb

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly configurable and flexible.
Open-source and free to use.
Supports dynamic media transcoding.
Lightweight and efficient with system resources.
Compatible with a wide range of DLNA/UPnP devices.

Limitations

Configuration can be complex for beginners.
User interface is functional but dated.
Active development has slowed down.
Requires a degree of technical knowledge for optimal setup.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

BubbleUPNP icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
BubbleUPNP vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Infuse icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
Infuse vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
OSMC icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
OSMC vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Plex icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
Plex vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement
PS3 Media Server icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
PS3 Media Server vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Serviio icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
Serviio vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
TVersity icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
TVersity vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Universal Media Server icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
Universal Media Server vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Ushare uPnP media server icon
VS
MiniDLNA icon
Ushare uPnP media server vs MiniDLNA

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare