Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) vs zathura : Which is Better?

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) icon

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js)

PDF.js. A general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs. Developed by Mozilla Labs

License: Open Source

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Google Chrome Opera

VS
VS
zathura icon

zathura

zathura is a PDF viewer. Developed by pwmt.org

License: Open Source

Categories: Office & Productivity

Apps available for Linux Xfce

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) VS zathura

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) is ideal for users looking for a fast, integrated solution within their web browser, providing essential PDF functionalities with ease of use. In contrast, Zathura caters to advanced users who prefer a highly customizable, command-line driven PDF viewer, offering powerful editing capabilities and a minimalist design.

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js)

Pros:

  • Cross-platform availability
  • Built-in browser integration
  • Good annotation tools
  • Easy to use interface
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports multiple PDF features
  • Bookmarking functionality
  • Customizable with extensions
  • Supports text extraction
  • Stable performance

Cons:

  • Limited editing functionality
  • Dependent on web browser
  • May have performance issues with large PDFs
  • Not as customizable as desktop apps
  • Requires internet for browser version
  • Less feature-rich compared to dedicated apps
  • No command line support
  • Limited support for non-PDF formats
  • Fewer advanced features than desktop alternatives
  • Browser dependencies may limit functionality

zathura

Pros:

  • Highly customizable
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Strong command line support
  • Good for keyboard users
  • Supports document editing
  • Open source with community plugins
  • Great for advanced users
  • Efficient memory usage
  • Minimalist interface
  • Good performance with large files

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve for new users
  • Limited built-in features compared to some alternatives
  • Interface may seem too minimalist for some
  • Less intuitive for non-technical users
  • Limited support for non-PDF formats
  • Requires manual configuration for plugins
  • No browser integration
  • May lack some advanced annotation tools
  • Performance can vary with complex PDFs
  • Not as user-friendly as Firefox PDF Viewer

Compare Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js)

vs
Compare Adobe Acrobat Reader DC and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Chrome PDF Viewer Plug-in and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Document Viewer and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ePDFView and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Evince and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Foxit Reader and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Kami and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MuPDF and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Nitro Reader and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Okular and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PDF-XChange Viewer and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Preview and Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) and decide which is most suitable for you.