mRemoteNG vs GoToAssist : Which is Better?

mRemoteNG icon

mRemoteNG

mRemoteNG is the next generation of mRemote, open source, tabbed, multi-protocol, remote connections manager.

License: Open Source

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
GoToAssist icon

GoToAssist

GoToAssist is a cloud-based toolset for IT support teams and customer support organizations. Developed by Citrix Systems, Inc.

License: Commercial

Apps available for Windows Online Android iPhone Android Tablet

mRemoteNG VS GoToAssist

mRemoteNG is an open-source tool focused on providing multi-protocol remote access and session management, ideal for IT professionals. In contrast, GoToAssist is a comprehensive remote support solution with robust features for customer service, including file transfer and session recording, but comes at a cost.

mRemoteNG

Pros:

  • Open-source and free to use
  • Supports multiple remote access protocols
  • User-friendly interface
  • Highly customizable
  • Strong community support
  • No licensing fees
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Good for managing multiple connections
  • Cross-platform capability
  • Ideal for IT professionals

Cons:

  • Limited file transfer capabilities
  • No built-in chat functionality
  • Lacks session recording
  • Less suitable for customer support
  • May require technical expertise for setup
  • Limited documentation compared to proprietary software
  • Fewer integration options
  • No mobile access
  • No performance monitoring features
  • May not have regular updates

GoToAssist

Pros:

  • Robust remote control capabilities
  • Excellent file transfer options
  • Integrated chat functionality
  • Session recording and playback
  • Strong customer support
  • Mobile application available
  • User-friendly for non-technical users
  • Integration with other tools
  • Good for customer support scenarios
  • Reliable performance

Cons:

  • Paid service with ongoing costs
  • May be overkill for simple tasks
  • Requires internet connection for full functionality
  • Can have performance issues with slow connections
  • Limited customization compared to open-source solutions
  • Dependency on external servers
  • Privacy concerns with data handling
  • Complex setup for advanced features
  • Not ideal for IT professionals who need protocol flexibility
  • Potentially less control over the environment

Compare mRemoteNG

vs
Compare Apple Remote Desktop and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BitKinex and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FireSSH and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ISL AlwaysOn and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare JuiceSSH and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare LogMeIn and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MobaXterm and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare NoMachine and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PAC Manager and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare rdesktop and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Remmina and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Remote Desktop Manager and mRemoteNG and decide which is most suitable for you.