mRemoteNG vs PuTTY

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

mRemoteNG icon

mRemoteNG

mRemoteNG is an open-source, tabbed, multi-protocol remote connections manager. It allows users to manage all their remote connections from a single, easy-to-use interface, supporting protocols like RDP, VNC, SSH, HTTP/S, Telnet, rlogin, and Raw Socket. It provides a centralized platform for managing a diverse range of remote access technologies, enhancing productivity and organization for network administrators, IT professionals, and power users.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
PuTTY icon

PuTTY

PuTTY is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. It supports multiple network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. Its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for Windows platforms.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

mRemoteNG and PuTTY are both powerful solutions in their space. mRemoteNG offers mremoteng is an open-source, tabbed, multi-protocol remote connections manager. it allows users to manage all their remote connections from a single, easy-to-use interface, supporting protocols like rdp, vnc, ssh, http/s, telnet, rlogin, and raw socket. it provides a centralized platform for managing a diverse range of remote access technologies, enhancing productivity and organization for network administrators, it professionals, and power users., while PuTTY provides putty is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. it supports multiple network protocols, including ssh, telnet, and rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for windows platforms.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

mRemoteNG

mRemoteNG

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Manages multiple protocols (RDP, SSH, VNC, etc.) in one application.
Effective tabbed interface for managing concurrent connections.
Organized connection tree for easy navigation.
Integrated SSH client with PuTTY compatibility.
Open source and free to use.

Limitations

Interface might feel basic compared to some commercial alternatives.
Development and updates rely on community contributions.
Configuration of advanced settings can require technical understanding.
PuTTY

PuTTY

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source, making it accessible and auditable.
Robust and reliable SSH implementation for secure connections.
Highly configurable, allowing extensive customization of appearance and behavior.
Lightweight and portable, requiring minimal resources and no installation.
Supports multiple protocols (SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, Serial, Raw).
Basic but effective session management for saving connection details.

Limitations

User interface is functional but can appear outdated and less intuitive to new users.
File transfer capabilities (PSCP, PSFTP) are command-line based, lacking an integrated graphical interface.
Limited advanced features compared to some modern, commercial terminal clients.
Configuration options, while extensive, are presented in a less visually organized manner.
Doesn't natively support tabs within a single window, requiring multiple PuTTY instances for concurrent sessions.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare