Papers vs Paperpile : Which is Better?

Papers icon

Papers

Papers helps you collect and curate the research material that you're passionate about. Developed by Mek&Tosj

License: Commercial

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Online iPhone iPad

VS
VS
Paperpile icon

Paperpile

Paperpile is a web-based reference management software, with special emphasis on integration with Google Docs and Google Scholar.

License: Commercial

Apps available for Online Google Chrome Google Drive Google Drive - Docs Google Scholar

Papers VS Paperpile

Papers is a solid reference management tool with strong offline capabilities and organization features, making it ideal for individual researchers. In contrast, Paperpile excels in real-time collaboration and integration with Google Docs, making it better suited for academic teams and collaborative projects.

Papers

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Strong organizational features
  • Great for offline access
  • Good PDF annotation tools
  • Robust search functionality
  • Highly customizable citation formats
  • Supports a variety of citation styles
  • Works well as a standalone application
  • Offers good user support
  • Affordable pricing

Cons:

  • Limited collaboration features
  • No integration with Google Docs
  • Higher learning curve for some users
  • No mobile app
  • Limited online support resources
  • Less effective for team projects
  • Not ideal for real-time collaboration
  • Backup options can be complex
  • No seamless cloud integration
  • Limited customization options

Paperpile

Pros:

  • Seamless integration with Google Docs
  • Strong collaboration features
  • Good for academic teams
  • Excellent web browser extension
  • Easy to import references from databases
  • User-friendly design
  • Cloud-based storage
  • Good data privacy options
  • Automated updates
  • Effective citation management

Cons:

  • Subscription-based pricing
  • Less effective offline
  • Limited organizational features compared to some alternatives
  • Less robust PDF annotation tools
  • Not as customizable as some users may want
  • Can be overwhelming for new users
  • May require internet connectivity for full functionality
  • Limited offline access
  • Higher cost in the long run
  • Potential data privacy concerns

Compare Papers

vs
Compare Benubird PDF and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BibDesk and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BibSonomy and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Citavi and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare colwiz and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Docear and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare EndNote and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare JabRef and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Mendeley and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Qiqqa and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ReadCube and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare SCIENTILLA and Papers and decide which is most suitable for you.