PostgreSQL VS Apache Cassandra
PostgreSQL is a relational database known for its ACID compliance and strong SQL capabilities, making it ideal for applications requiring complex transactions. In contrast, Apache Cassandra is a NoSQL database designed for high availability and scalability, excelling in handling large volumes of write operations across distributed systems.
PostgreSQL
Pros:
- ACID compliance
- Rich SQL support
- Strong community support
- Extensive indexing options
- Built-in replication and failover
Cons:
- Performance can degrade with very large datasets
- Not as scalable as NoSQL solutions
- Complex configuration for replication
Apache Cassandra
Pros:
- High availability and scalability
- Flexible schema design
- Fast write operations
- Designed for distributed data
- Multi-data center replication
Cons:
- Eventual consistency can lead to stale reads
- Limited support for complex queries
- Steeper learning curve for new users
Compare PostgreSQL
Compare ArangoDB and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare CouchBase and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Firebird and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare H2 Database Engine and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Microsoft SQL Server and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MySQL Community Edition and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Oracle Database and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare RethinkDB and PostgreSQL and decide which is most suitable for you.