PuTTY vs Sakura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

PuTTY icon

PuTTY

PuTTY is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. It supports multiple network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. Its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for Windows platforms.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com
Screenshots:
VS
Sakura icon

Sakura

Sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on GTK and libvte. It provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on Linux systems. by [email protected]

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

PuTTY and Sakura are both powerful solutions in their space. PuTTY offers putty is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. it supports multiple network protocols, including ssh, telnet, and rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for windows platforms., while Sakura provides sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on gtk and libvte. it provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on linux systems.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

PuTTY

PuTTY

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source, making it accessible and auditable.
Robust and reliable SSH implementation for secure connections.
Highly configurable, allowing extensive customization of appearance and behavior.
Lightweight and portable, requiring minimal resources and no installation.
Supports multiple protocols (SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, Serial, Raw).
Basic but effective session management for saving connection details.

Limitations

User interface is functional but can appear outdated and less intuitive to new users.
File transfer capabilities (PSCP, PSFTP) are command-line based, lacking an integrated graphical interface.
Limited advanced features compared to some modern, commercial terminal clients.
Configuration options, while extensive, are presented in a less visually organized manner.
Doesn't natively support tabs within a single window, requiring multiple PuTTY instances for concurrent sessions.
Sakura

Sakura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Excellent input responsiveness.
Stable and reliable performance.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features like built-in tabs or split-panes.
Limited customization options compared to some competitors.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare