PuTTY vs Sakura : Which is Better?
VS
VS
License: Open Source
PuTTY VS Sakura
PuTTY is a lightweight and highly configurable SSH client known for its simplicity and versatility, while Sakura offers a more modern multi-tabbed interface with additional features for session management and ease of use. Both applications are free and open-source but cater to slightly different user preferences.
PuTTY
Pros:
- Free and open-source
- Supports SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin protocols
- Highly configurable with various options
- Supports X11 forwarding
- Portability (can run from USB drive)
- Supports multiple sessions in tabs
- Supports public key authentication
- Customizable appearance (fonts, colors)
- Can save session profiles
- Lightweight and low resource usage
Cons:
- Limited support for advanced scripting
- No built-in file transfer capabilities
- User interface may feel outdated
- Does not have a built-in password manager
- Limited documentation compared to alternatives
Sakura
Pros:
- Free and open-source
- Multi-tabbed interface for easy session management
- Customizable keyboard shortcuts
- Built-in support for SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin
- Supports Unicode and various character encodings
- Easy to use with a straightforward interface
- Saves connection history for quick access
- Supports drag-and-drop file transfer
- Allows for customizable themes and colors
- Integrated terminal features like split view
Cons:
- Limited customization for advanced users
- Occasional bugs in newer versions
- Performance issues with many simultaneous sessions
Compare PuTTY
Compare Guake terminal and PuTTY and decide which is most suitable for you.
