Apache Subversion vs Mercurial SCM : Which is Better?
Apache Subversion
Apache Subversion (SVN) is a software versioning and revision control system distributed as open source under the Apache License. Developed by Apache Software Foundation
License: Open Source
VS
VS
Apache Subversion VS Mercurial SCM
Apache Subversion (SVN) is ideal for projects requiring a centralized approach with controlled access, while Mercurial SCM excels in flexibility and offline capabilities due to its distributed nature. The choice between them often depends on the specific needs of the project and team dynamics.
Apache Subversion
Pros:
- Centralized model makes it easy to manage and maintain a single source of truth.
- Better for large binary files and large projects due to efficient handling.
- Strong support for access control and permissions.
Cons:
- Less flexible for branching and merging compared to distributed systems.
- Requires a constant connection to the central server for most operations.
Mercurial SCM
Pros:
- Distributed model allows for offline work and local repositories.
- Flexible branching and merging capabilities.
- Strong performance with large codebases and many contributors.
Cons:
- Can be complex for new users to grasp the distributed model.
- Larger repository sizes may become cumbersome.
Compare Apache Subversion
Compare Bazaar and Apache Subversion and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Fossil and Apache Subversion and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Git and Apache Subversion and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Git for Windows and Apache Subversion and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Perforce and Apache Subversion and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Trac and Apache Subversion and decide which is most suitable for you.