Textadept vs Kate : Which is Better?
Textadept VS Kate Feature comparision
| Feature | Textadept | Kate |
|---|---|---|
| Command line interface | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Lua scripting | ||
| Portable | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes | ||
| File management | ||
| MarkDown support | ||
| Notetaking | ||
| Support for regular expressions | ||
| Themes | ||
| Plugins | ||
| Asynchronous | ||
| Configurable |
Compare Textadept
Compare Aptana Studio and Textadept and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and Textadept and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNU Emacs and Textadept and decide which is most suitable for you.
