UltraEdit vs GNU Emacs : Which is Better?
UltraEdit VS GNU Emacs Feature comparision
| Feature | UltraEdit | GNU Emacs |
|---|---|---|
| Column based text editing | ||
| Hex Editor | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Python | ||
| Developer Tools | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Java IDE | ||
| Beauty and fluid interface | ||
| Code completion | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Self-documenting | ||
| Extensions | ||
| IDE All Languages | ||
| Scripting | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes |
Compare UltraEdit
Compare 010 Editor and UltraEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Aptana Studio and UltraEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and UltraEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and UltraEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Code::Blocks and UltraEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare CotEditor and UltraEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.