Yammer vs App.net

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Yammer icon

Yammer

Yammer is an enterprise social networking service designed for private communication within organizations, fostering open collaboration and knowledge sharing across departments and teams. by Yammer

Commercial
Platforms: Online Android iPhone Windows Phone
Screenshots:
VS
App.net icon

App.net

App.net was a subscription-based online social networking service and microblogging platform, notable for its explicit rejection of advertising in favor of a developer-centric and user-supported model. by appdotnet

Open Source
Platforms: Online Android iPhone Discontinued
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Yammer and App.net are both powerful solutions in their space. Yammer offers yammer is an enterprise social networking service designed for private communication within organizations, fostering open collaboration and knowledge sharing across departments and teams., while App.net provides app.net was a subscription-based online social networking service and microblogging platform, notable for its explicit rejection of advertising in favor of a developer-centric and user-supported model.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Yammer

Yammer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Promotes open communication and knowledge sharing.
Strong integration within the Microsoft 365 suite.
Provides a familiar social media-like interface.
Helps in breaking down departmental silos.
Mobile applications ensure accessibility.
Supports community building and engagement.

Limitations

Success heavily relies on user adoption and engagement.
Can potentially overlap with features in Microsoft Teams.
Requires active management and promotion to thrive.
Information overload can occur in large, active networks.
App.net

App.net

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Completely ad-free experience for users.
Strong focus on and support for third-party developers.
Subscription model aimed at aligning interests with users.
Cleaner and more private user environment due to lack of ad tracking.

Limitations

Subscription fee was a major barrier to user adoption.
Relatively small user base compared to mainstream platforms.
Limited native feature set outside of core microblogging.
Ultimately unsustainable business model leading to shutdown.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare