Assembla vs GitBucket Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Assembla icon

Assembla

Assembla is a comprehensive platform for software development teams, offering robust version control hosting (SVN, Perforce, Git), agile project management tools, and collaboration features. It streamlines workflows, tracks tasks, and provides insights for efficient project delivery. by Andy Singleton

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Online
VS
GitBucket icon

GitBucket

GitBucket is an open-source, self-hosted Git platform built with Scala. It provides a user-friendly web interface for repository management, collaboration tools, and integration capabilities for teams looking for a lightweight alternative to larger platforms. by Naoki Takezoe

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Self-Hosted Scala

Summary

Assembla and GitBucket are both powerful solutions in their space. Assembla offers assembla is a comprehensive platform for software development teams, offering robust version control hosting (svn, perforce, git), agile project management tools, and collaboration features. it streamlines workflows, tracks tasks, and provides insights for efficient project delivery., while GitBucket provides gitbucket is an open-source, self-hosted git platform built with scala. it provides a user-friendly web interface for repository management, collaboration tools, and integration capabilities for teams looking for a lightweight alternative to larger platforms.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Assembla

Assembla

Pros

  • Excellent hosting for SVN and Perforce, catering to specific needs.
  • Integrated platform for version control and project management saves time.
  • Strong support for agile methodologies with Kanban and Scrum tools.
  • Comprehensive task and bug tracking features.
  • Flexibility with integrations and customization options.
  • Offers on-premises deployment for enhanced control and security.

Cons

  • Can be complex to set up and navigate initially due to extensive features.
  • Learning curve associated with mastering both version control and project management aspects.
  • User interface can feel dated compared to some newer platforms.
  • Cost can be a factor for smaller teams or limited budgets.
GitBucket

GitBucket

Pros

  • Lightweight and performant.
  • Easy to install and maintain.
  • Provides core Git hosting and collaboration features.
  • Self-hosted for data control.
  • Extensible through a plugin system.

Cons

  • Features may be less extensive than larger platforms.
  • Smaller plugin ecosystem compared to established alternatives.
  • Requires self-management and maintenance.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare