CotEditor vs TextWrangler

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

CotEditor icon

CotEditor

CotEditor is a free and open-source text editor designed specifically for macOS. It offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it a lightweight yet powerful tool for plain text editing, coding, and more. by AYNiMac

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
TextWrangler icon

TextWrangler

TextWrangler was a widely-used, free text and code editor for macOS, renowned for its simplicity, reliability, and powerful features derived from its professional sibling, BBEdit. It offered a clean interface suitable for both basic text editing and light coding tasks. by Bare Bones Software

Free
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

CotEditor and TextWrangler are both powerful solutions in their space. CotEditor offers coteditor is a free and open-source text editor designed specifically for macos. it offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it a lightweight yet powerful tool for plain text editing, coding, and more., while TextWrangler provides textwrangler was a widely-used, free text and code editor for macos, renowned for its simplicity, reliability, and powerful features derived from its professional sibling, bbedit. it offered a clean interface suitable for both basic text editing and light coding tasks.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

CotEditor

CotEditor

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent performance and lightweight.
Native macOS application with deep system integration.
Clean and intuitive user interface.
Free and open source.
Good syntax highlighting with customization options.

Limitations

Limited plugin ecosystem compared to larger editors.
Lacks advanced IDE features like debugging and robust project management.
TextWrangler

TextWrangler

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free of charge
Reliable and stable, especially with large files
Integrated FTP/SFTP support
Powerful search and replace with regex
Good performance and lightweight

Limitations

No longer actively developed
Lacks modern features of newer editors (e.g., extensive plugin ecosystem)
User interface is functional but basic

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare