ePDFView vs zathura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

ePDFView icon

ePDFView

ePDFView is a free, lightweight PDF viewer designed for speed and simplicity, built upon the Poppler rendering engine and GTK+ toolkit. Ideal for users prioritizing performance and minimal resource consumption on Linux systems.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:
VS
zathura icon

zathura

Zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the Poppler rendering engine. It is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings. by pwmt.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

ePDFView and zathura are both powerful solutions in their space. ePDFView offers epdfview is a free, lightweight pdf viewer designed for speed and simplicity, built upon the poppler rendering engine and gtk+ toolkit. ideal for users prioritizing performance and minimal resource consumption on linux systems., while zathura provides zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the poppler rendering engine. it is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

ePDFView

ePDFView

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast
Low memory consumption
Clean and simple user interface
Excellent for basic PDF viewing

Limitations

Limited features beyond basic viewing
No extensive editing or annotation capabilities
Primarily focused on Linux environment
zathura

zathura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Excellent keyboard navigation for efficient browsing.
Highly customizable through a simple configuration file.
Minimalistic and clean user interface.
Low memory usage makes it suitable for older systems.
Supports multiple document formats via backends.

Limitations

Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with keyboard shortcuts.
Lacks advanced features found in mainstream viewers (e.g., comprehensive annotation, form filling).
Configuration requires editing a text file.
No graphical menus or toolbars for easy access to options.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare