Ghost vs ExpressionEngine

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Ghost icon

Ghost

Ghost is a leading open-source publishing platform designed for professional journalists and bloggers. It offers a beautifully crafted interface focused on writing and editorial workflows, providing powerful tools for content creation, audience building, and monetization. by John O'Nolan and Hannah Wolfe

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted Cloudron Node.JS
Screenshots:
VS
ExpressionEngine icon

ExpressionEngine

ExpressionEngine is a versatile and powerful content management platform designed for building dynamic websites, blogs, and web applications with a focus on flexibility and developer control. by EllisLab, Inc

Commercial
Platforms: Online

Comparison Summary

Ghost and ExpressionEngine are both powerful solutions in their space. Ghost offers ghost is a leading open-source publishing platform designed for professional journalists and bloggers. it offers a beautifully crafted interface focused on writing and editorial workflows, providing powerful tools for content creation, audience building, and monetization., while ExpressionEngine provides expressionengine is a versatile and powerful content management platform designed for building dynamic websites, blogs, and web applications with a focus on flexibility and developer control.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Ghost

Ghost

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Clean and minimalist writing interface.
Built-in membership and subscription features for monetization.
Excellent performance and speed.
Focus on core publishing features.
Open-source and highly customizable.

Limitations

Smaller plugin ecosystem compared to some competitors.
Requires some technical knowledge for self-hosting and advanced customization.
Learning curve for users accustomed to different editors.
ExpressionEngine

ExpressionEngine

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly flexible and customizable content structure.
Powerful templating system for precise output control.
Strong reputation for security.
Suitable for complex web applications and multi-site needs.
Intuitive control panel for content editors.

Limitations

Steeper learning curve compared to some other CMS platforms.
Requires self-hosting and server management.
Add-on ecosystem is smaller than the largest CMS platforms.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare