GNOME Commander vs Thunar : Which is Better?

GNOME Commander icon

GNOME Commander

GNOME Commander is a two-panel graphical file manager for GNOME.

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a file manager for Linux and other Unix-like systems, written using the GTK+ 2 toolkit. Developed by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux Xfce

GNOME Commander VS Thunar

Thunar is a lightweight, simple file manager that excels in speed and basic file management tasks, making it ideal for users looking for a straightforward experience. In contrast, GNOME Commander offers advanced features like multi-panel support and FTP capabilities, catering to power users who require more flexibility and control over their file management.

GNOME Commander

Pros:

  • Multi-panel interface for easier file management
  • Tabbed browsing for quick access to multiple directories
  • Built-in support for FTP and SFTP
  • Archive management capabilities
  • Highly customizable interface
  • Accessibility features for users with disabilities
  • Advanced file operations and management tools
  • Good for power users
  • Supports custom actions
  • Can be used in various desktop environments

Cons:

  • Heavier than Thunar, may be slower on low-end systems
  • More complex interface that may overwhelm new users
  • Requires more configuration to set up
  • Less integrated into XFCE desktop
  • Not as lightweight as Thunar
  • Can be resource-intensive
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Not as user-friendly for simple tasks
  • May not perform as well on older hardware
  • Customization can be complicated

Thunar

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Simple and clean user interface
  • Good integration with XFCE desktop environment
  • Custom actions for file management
  • Efficient file operations
  • Supports plugins for extended functionality
  • File previews for images and videos
  • Keyboard shortcuts for quick navigation
  • Good file system integration
  • User-friendly for basic file management tasks

Cons:

  • Limited advanced features compared to full-fledged file managers
  • Lacks multi-panel support
  • No tabbed browsing
  • Less suited for power users
  • Limited archive management options
  • Customization options are somewhat basic
  • No built-in FTP/SFTP support
  • Fewer keyboard shortcuts compared to GNOME Commander
  • Limited accessibility features
  • Not as feature-rich as some other file managers

Compare GNOME Commander

vs
Compare Dolphin File Manager and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Double Commander and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Explorer++ and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Far Manager and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Finder and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare fman and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Forklift and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FreeCommander and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Just Manager and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Krusader and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Marlin and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Midnight Commander and GNOME Commander and decide which is most suitable for you.